{"id":8366,"date":"2021-03-17T12:39:10","date_gmt":"2021-03-17T10:39:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nyje.al\/?p=8366"},"modified":"2024-09-13T12:35:51","modified_gmt":"2024-09-13T10:35:51","slug":"nje-bisede-me-thomas-h-ogden-pjesa-e-dyte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/nje-bisede-me-thomas-h-ogden-pjesa-e-dyte\/","title":{"rendered":"Nj\u00eb bised\u00eb me Thomas H. Ogden (pjesa e dyt\u00eb)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

P\u00ebrkthim | Genc Shehu | 16.03.2021| nyje.al<\/strong><\/span><\/p>

\"Photo Fotografi nga Moriah Wolfe publikuar ne Unsplash<\/span><\/span><\/p>

LDD<\/em>: Tom, dashuria juaj p\u00ebr gjuh\u00ebn dhe let\u00ebrsin\u00eb provokon mendim. Isha duke lexuar librin tuaj t\u00eb fundit, Creative Readings<\/em>\u00a0dhe m\u00eb p\u00eblqyen shum\u00eb komentar\u00ebt mbi tekste t\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhura t\u00eb Freud-it, Isaacs-it, Fairbairn-it, Winnicott-it, Bionit, Loewald-it dhe Searles-it. Po mendoj k\u00ebtu p\u00ebr dashurin\u00eb si m\u00ebnyr\u00eb zbulimi t\u00eb di\u00e7kaje t\u00eb re \u2013 n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, zbulimi i di\u00e7kaje t\u00eb re n\u00eb k\u00ebto tekste. Leximi yt \u00ebsht\u00eb bind\u00ebs, \u00e7el m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb reja t\u00eb kuptuari dhe ndri\u00e7on pik\u00ebn e err\u00ebt t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre mendimtar\u00ebve t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm. Duket sikur autor\u00ebt q\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjodhe qen\u00eb psikoanalist\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk kishin frik\u00eb t\u00eb shkonin p\u00ebrtej kanonit ekzistues. Ata ishin jokonformist\u00eb, mendimtar\u00eb t\u00eb pavarur, disi vizionar\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt po ashtu kishin nj\u00eb dashuri p\u00ebr paraardh\u00ebsit e tyre. A mund t\u00eb thoni di\u00e7ka m\u00eb shum\u00eb rreth pasionit tuaj p\u00ebr k\u00ebta autor\u00eb dhe se n\u00eb \u00e7\u2019m\u00ebnyr\u00eb i fusni n\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim si paraardh\u00ebsit tuaj psikoanalitik\u00eb?<\/span><\/p>

THO<\/em>: Kur p\u00ebrdorni fraz\u00ebn paraardh\u00ebs psikoanalitik\u00eb<\/em>, mendimi i par\u00eb q\u00eb m\u00eb nd\u00ebrmendet \u00ebsht\u00eb eseja e Borgesit ku ai thot\u00eb se Kafka krijoi paraardh\u00ebsit e vet. Mendoj se un\u00eb dhe t\u00eb gjith\u00eb lexuesit e tjer\u00eb krijojm\u00eb paraardh\u00ebsit tan\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb se ne gjejm\u00eb \u2013 ose ndofta krijojm\u00eb \u2013 vetveten n\u00eb shkrimet e t\u00eb par\u00ebve tan\u00eb. Gjejm\u00eb nj\u00eb potencial t\u00eb pasend\u00ebrtuar n\u00eb veprat e tyre prej t\u00eb cilit zbulojm\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm se kush ishin ata, por edhe kush jemi ne. N\u00eb dekad\u00ebn e kaluar, n\u00eb serin\u00eb e artikujve t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhur t\u00eb Creative readings<\/em>, un\u00eb, pa ia shtruar ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb k\u00ebshtu vetes, kam krijuar vet\u00eb pem\u00ebn e familjes time psikoanalitike. Duke shkruar rreth vepr\u00ebs s\u00eb k\u00ebtyre autor\u00ebve un\u00eb kam deri diku rishkruar vepr\u00ebn e tyre n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb imja dhe n\u00eb nj\u00eb kuptim tjet\u00ebr, ata m\u00eb kan\u00eb rishkruar mua p\u00ebrmes ndikimit t\u00eb tyre mbi mua. E kam p\u00ebrdorur vepr\u00ebn e tyre n\u00eb bash t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb Winnicott-i p\u00ebrshkruan p\u00ebrdorimin q\u00eb foshnja i b\u00ebn t\u00eb \u00ebm\u00ebs si pasqyr\u00eb. M\u00eb lini t\u00eb shpjegohem se \u00e7\u2019dua t\u00eb them me k\u00ebt\u00eb krahasim. Idet\u00eb e Winnicott-it rreth funksionit pasqyr\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb zakon t\u00eb keqthuhen n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm \u00e7orienton, por edhe e shnd\u00ebrron di\u00e7ka thelb\u00ebsore p\u00ebr zhvillimin n\u00eb di\u00e7ka patologjike. Tep\u00ebr shpesh lexoj dhe d\u00ebgjoj analist\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruajn\u00eb rolin pasqyr\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs si \u201cfoshnja q\u00eb sheh veten n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs\u201d. Winnicott n\u00eb fakt thot\u00eb se foshnja sheh \u201cdi\u00e7ka si<\/em>\u00a0vetja\u201d n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs. Kjo e fundit \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb funksion simbolik n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin foshnja sheh veten t\u00eb transformuar<\/em>\u00a0n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs \u2013 ai sheh interpretimin e vetes nga n\u00ebna, ose me fjal\u00eb t\u00eb tjera, foshnja sheh metafor\u00ebn q\u00eb ka krijuar n\u00ebna e tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb shprehur mbres\u00ebn q\u00eb foshnja e saj i ka l\u00ebn\u00eb. Ky transformim i vetes q\u00eb foshnja sheh n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs s\u00eb tij ekziston n\u00eb nj\u00eb sfer\u00eb joverbale simbolike. Foshnja q\u00eb foshnja sheh n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb imazhi i tij pasqyr\u00eb (dyt\u00ebshori i tij). N\u00eb vend t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj, ai sheh mbres\u00ebn, damk\u00ebn q\u00eb ai ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb person tjet\u00ebr, nj\u00eb mbres\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebs n\u00ebna i ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb di\u00e7ka nga vetja.<\/span><\/p>

Prej k\u00ebtij k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrimi, p\u00ebrvoja e foshnj\u00ebs q\u00eb sheh di\u00e7ka si<\/em>\u00a0vetja n\u00eb syt\u00eb e s\u00eb \u00ebm\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e lidhjes me dik\u00eb q\u00eb nuk<\/em>\u00a0\u00ebsht\u00eb ai. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb, p\u00ebrvoja e pasqyrimit \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e ndarjes n\u00eb dy kuptime t\u00eb ndryshme. S\u00eb pari, ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e ndashm\u00ebris\u00eb prej n\u00ebn\u00ebs, e cila \u00ebsht\u00eb person m\u00eb vete q\u00eb b\u00ebn metafora nga ana e vet p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjetimin e saj t\u00eb foshnj\u00ebs. T\u00eb pakt\u00ebn me po aq r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi, p\u00ebrvoja e shikimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb varianti t\u00eb transformuar metaforikisht t\u00eb vetes n\u00eb syt\u00eb e dikujt tjet\u00ebr \u00ebsht\u00eb ngjarje vendimtare n\u00eb zhvillimin e vet\u00eb kapacitetit t\u00eb foshnj\u00ebs p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrgjegje, vet\u00ebdije t\u00eb vetes. N\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e foshnj\u00ebs teksa shikon \u00a0metafor\u00ebn q\u00eb n\u00ebna ka krijuar p\u00ebr p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e saj p\u00ebr t\u00eb<\/em>, dy variante t\u00eb foshnj\u00ebs b\u00ebhen reale nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht n\u00eb mendjen e foshnj\u00ebs: foshnja si vete q\u00eb percepton (un\u00eb) dhe foshnja si objekt i perceptimit t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs (mua). Hap\u00ebsira midis foshnj\u00ebs vrojtuese (un\u00eb) dhe foshnj\u00ebs s\u00eb vrojtuar i par\u00eb n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs (mua) \u00ebsht\u00eb hap\u00ebsira n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn p\u00ebrvoja e nd\u00ebrgjegjes lind, hap\u00ebsira ku foshnja \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00ebherazi vetja vrojtuese dhe vetja e vrojtuar.<\/span><\/p>

Un\u00eb gjej n\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e leximit t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs s\u00eb mendimtar\u00ebve t\u00eb m\u00ebdhenj analitik\u00eb di\u00e7ka nga p\u00ebrvoja e rolit pasqyr\u00eb q\u00eb po diskutoj. I shoh idet\u00eb e tyre si metafora p\u00ebr vet\u00eb mendimin tim (mendim q\u00eb ndodh n\u00eb procesin e leximit t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs s\u00eb tyre). Nuk mund ta theksoj mjaftuesh\u00ebm se bash n\u00eb idet\u00eb e tyre<\/em>, ide q\u00eb nuk<\/em>\u00a0jan\u00eb krijesa t\u00eb miat, gjej reflektime (transformime) t\u00eb vetes q\u00eb nuk i kam ditur m\u00eb par\u00eb. Pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebt\u00eb transformim t\u00eb vetes p\u00ebrdor q\u00eb t\u00eb rishkruaj vepr\u00ebn tyre n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb origjinale \u2013 pra, ajo \u00e7ka shkruaj \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00eb mendimi im, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00ebherazi i ndar\u00eb prej tyre (k\u00ebto jan\u00eb idet\u00eb e mia origjinale) dhe i pandar\u00eb prej tyre (idet\u00eb e mia jan\u00eb transformime t\u00eb t\u00eb tyreve). Th\u00ebn\u00eb edhe n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb tjet\u00ebr, ata m\u00eb kan\u00eb par\u00eb mua n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb un\u00eb ende nuk e kam par\u00eb veten; dhe un\u00eb i lexoj n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb ata ende nuk jan\u00eb par\u00eb. \u00cbsht\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim q\u00eb un\u00eb krijoj vet\u00eb paraardh\u00ebsit e mi t\u00eb cil\u00ebt m\u00eb krijojn\u00eb mua teksa ua lexoj vepr\u00ebn.<\/span><\/p>

T\u00eb konceptohet k\u00ebshtu prejardhja \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb mohohet nocioni i koh\u00ebs rrept\u00ebsisht kronologjike. L\u00ebvizja e ndikimit (dhe koh\u00ebs) nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm nga e shkuara n\u00eb t\u00eb tashmen n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen. L\u00ebvizja e ndikimit dhe koh\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb po ashtu nga e ardhmja n\u00eb t\u00eb tashmen n\u00eb t\u00eb shkuar\u00ebn. Ne q\u00eb jemi lexuesit aktual\u00eb t\u00eb Freud-it, Isaacs-it dhe Winnicott-it ndryshojm\u00eb t\u00eb shkuar\u00ebn (ia shnd\u00ebrrojm\u00eb vepr\u00ebn si\u00e7 e kishin kuptuar ata) n\u00eb aktin ton\u00eb t\u00eb tanish\u00ebm t\u00eb transformimit (rishpikjes) t\u00eb asaj q\u00eb shkruan ata. Mbi t\u00eb gjitha, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb veprat e tyre tonat, ne vijm\u00eb n\u00eb jet\u00eb si mendimtar\u00eb t\u00eb denj\u00eb m\u00eb vete, me idet\u00eb tona q\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen do t\u2019i p\u00ebrdorin n\u00eb procesin e krijimit t\u00eb vetvetes n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb paimagjinueshme p\u00ebr ne tani.<\/span><\/p>

LDD<\/em>: P\u00ebrgjat\u00eb dekadave q\u00eb keni praktikuar psikoanaliz\u00eb, \u00e7far\u00eb ju duket se ndodhet n\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00ebn e saj?<\/span><\/p>

THO<\/em>: Dy gj\u00ebsende m\u00eb vin\u00eb menj\u00ebher\u00eb n\u00eb mendje si p\u00ebrgjigje ndaj pyetjes suaj. E para \u00ebsht\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsia e t\u00eb qenurit i njer\u00ebzish\u00ebm. Pa k\u00ebt\u00eb si karakteristik\u00eb p\u00ebrkufizuese t\u00eb analistit, nuk ka asgj\u00eb psikoanalitike rreth p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs q\u00eb ndodh midis analistit dhe pacientit. Kam patur shum\u00eb njer\u00ebz, kandidat\u00eb ashtu sikurse njer\u00ebz jasht\u00eb profesionit t\u00eb sh\u00ebndetit mendor, q\u00eb jan\u00eb k\u00ebshilluar me mua sa i p\u00ebrket v\u00ebshtir\u00ebsive n\u00eb analizat e tyre personale. Pothuaj gjithmon\u00eb, analisti nuk ka qen\u00eb i aft\u00eb t\u00eb menaxhoj\u00eb kund\u00ebr-transferenc\u00ebn dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb \u00e7njer\u00ebzor n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e vet t\u00eb t\u00eb qenuri me pacientin. Disa her\u00eb kjo merr trajt\u00ebn e analistit q\u00eb e trajton pacientin sikur t\u00eb ishte armik i mir\u00ebqenies s\u00eb tij, integritetit t\u00eb tij, namit t\u00eb tij e k\u00ebshtu me radh\u00eb. Dhe n\u00eb pothuaj \u00e7do rast, mua m\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb dukur se, pavet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm, analisti e p\u00ebrjeton at\u00eb \u00e7ka po ndodh midis tij dhe pacientit si k\u00ebrc\u00ebnim kundrejt sh\u00ebndetit t\u00eb tij mendor. N\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigje ndaj k\u00ebtij rreziku, analisti kund\u00ebrsulmon duke u sjell\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb ai beson se do t\u00eb k\u00ebrc\u00ebnoj\u00eb sh\u00ebndetin mendor t\u00eb pacienit. Duke patur parasysh sa dije t\u00eb thell\u00eb ka p\u00ebr pacientin, analisti ndodhet n\u00eb nj\u00eb pozit\u00eb q\u00eb mundet t\u2019ia gjej\u00eb mjaft mir\u00eb pik\u00ebn m\u00eb t\u00eb tmerrshme pacientit.<\/span><\/p>

Nuk mund t\u00eb futem n\u00eb imt\u00ebsi p\u00ebr arsye konfidence, por n\u00eb disa raste kund\u00ebrsulmi i analistit ka marr\u00eb form\u00ebn e shfryt\u00ebzimit t\u00eb ndjenjave transferenciale t\u00eb pacientit n\u00eb lidhje me var\u00ebsin\u00eb e skajshme t\u00eb tij. N\u00eb k\u00ebto raste, analisti k\u00ebrc\u00ebnon shprehimisht ose me n\u00ebnkuptim t\u2019i pres\u00eb lidhjet me pacientin n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb atill\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebr\u00e7on ndjenj\u00ebn se nuk do ket\u00eb analist apo terapist tjet\u00ebr q\u00eb t\u00eb doj\u00eb t\u00eb merret me nj\u00eb pacient kaq t\u00eb shpifur dhe t\u00eb rreziksh\u00ebm. Jo vet\u00ebm q\u00eb analisti do ta braktiste pacientin, ai i p\u00ebr\u00e7on pacientit edhe iden\u00eb se gjith\u00e7ka tjet\u00ebr n\u00eb bot\u00eb do ta l\u00ebr\u00eb pacientin dhe k\u00ebsisoj pacienti do t\u00eb p\u00ebrfundoj\u00eb i vetmuar n\u00eb bot\u00eb, i paaft\u00eb t\u00eb kujdeset p\u00ebr veten dhe n\u00eb fund do \u00e7mendet apo do vdes\u00eb, q\u00eb ndjehen si e nj\u00ebta gj\u00eb. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb ajo q\u00eb dua t\u00eb them me trajtim \u00e7njer\u00ebzor t\u00eb pacientit. Kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>

Gj\u00ebja tjet\u00ebr q\u00eb m\u00eb erdhi nd\u00ebrmend sa i p\u00ebrket pyetjes suaj n\u00eb lidhje me \u00e7far\u00eb konsideroj un\u00eb si qendrore p\u00ebr psikoanaliz\u00ebn \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7ka q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb aq e vjet\u00ebr sa \u00ebsht\u00eb klishe dhe prap\u00eb besoj se shpesh m\u00ebnjanohet apo shp\u00ebrfillet si ide. N\u00eb mendje kam iden\u00eb se psikoanaliza nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb \u201cterapi e t\u00eb folurit\u201d, ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb \u201cterapi e bised\u00ebs\u201d. Nuk mjafton q\u00eb analisti t\u00eb d\u00ebgjoj\u00eb pacientin me \u201cv\u00ebmendje t\u00eb baraz-pezulluar\u201d, si\u00e7 i thoshte Freud-i, dhe t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb interpretime t\u00eb transferenc\u00ebs t\u00eb kurdisura mir\u00eb n\u00eb koh\u00eb. Edhe n\u00ebse kjo do t\u00eb b\u00ebhej me sakt\u00ebsin\u00eb dhe mjesht\u00ebrin\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb madhe t\u00eb mundshme, un\u00eb besoj, mb\u00ebshtetur nga mbik\u00ebqyrja e analist\u00ebve q\u00eb punojn\u00eb k\u00ebshtu, se pacienti b\u00ebhet m\u00eb i aft\u00eb t\u00eb vrojtoj\u00eb veten dhe t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb lidhje midis p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs s\u00eb shkuar dhe t\u00eb tashme. Por dituria rreth vetes nuk mjafton p\u00ebr t\u00eb shkaktuar rritje fundamentale psikologjike. P\u00ebrvoja analitike, p\u00ebr mendimin tim, \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoja e t\u00eb folurit me<\/em>\u00a0nj\u00eb person tjet\u00ebr, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e t\u00eb folurit kundrejt<\/em> nj\u00eb personi tjet\u00ebr. Kjo e dyta shpesh m\u00eb ngjan se p\u00ebrb\u00ebn di\u00e7ka t\u00eb krahasueshme me loj\u00ebn paralele t\u00eb f\u00ebmij\u00ebve. E para, nj\u00eb bised\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn dy njer\u00ebz flasin me nj\u00ebri-tjetrin, p\u00ebrfshin nj\u00eb tip tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb strukturimit t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs dhe t\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs. Biseda e folur jehon me nj\u00eb bised\u00eb t\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijshme n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn dy njer\u00ebz mendojn\u00eb bashk\u00eb. T\u00eb mendosh bashk\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb tipari tjet\u00ebr thelb\u00ebsor i psikoanaliz\u00ebs q\u00eb kam n\u00eb mendje. Si\u00e7 thash\u00eb m\u00eb her\u00ebt, duhen dy njer\u00ebz p\u00ebr me mendue \u2013 pra, lypet krijimi i nj\u00eb forme t\u00eb menduari t\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijshme t\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00eb prej mendimit dhe ndijimit t\u00eb dy njer\u00ebzve, q\u00eb i mund\u00ebson t\u00eb mendojn\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb asnj\u00ebri i vet\u00ebm individualisht nuk mund t\u00eb mendonte\/ndjente. \u00cbsht\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht kjo p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e t\u00eb menduarit me nj\u00eb person tjet\u00ebr me t\u00eb cilin je n\u00eb bised\u00eb, vet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm dhe pavet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm, q\u00eb besoj se ka potencialin t\u00eb krijoj\u00eb kushte n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat mund t\u00eb ndodh\u00eb nj\u00eb ndryshim psikologjik te pacienti dhe analisti. Ka shum\u00eb\u00e7ka q\u00eb futet n\u00eb b\u00ebrtham\u00eb t\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00ebs, por k\u00ebto jan\u00eb aspektet e nj\u00eb p\u00ebrvoje analitike q\u00eb mua m\u00eb duken thelb\u00ebsore.<\/span><\/p>

LDD<\/em>: Tom, ju keni prezantuar konceptin e \u201ct\u00eb tretit analitik\u201d. Si dallon ky koncept nga ai i \u201cfush\u00ebs analitike\u201d?<\/span><\/p>

THO<\/em>: Un\u00eb n\u00eb fakt i p\u00ebrdor t\u00eb dy. Se k\u00eb p\u00ebrdor varet nga cili aspekt i p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs analitike rrekem t\u00eb mendoj apo t\u00eb flas. T\u00eb dy konceptet jan\u00eb metafora dhe secili thekson nj\u00eb aspekt t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm t\u00eb funksionimit mendor. Mendja nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gj\u00eb materiale \u2013 nuk mund ta shoh\u00ebsh, mas\u00ebsh as madje ta lokalizosh at\u00eb. Nuk z\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00ebn midis vesh\u00ebve tan\u00eb. Pavar\u00ebsisht faktit q\u00eb un\u00eb e di k\u00ebt\u00eb, nuk mund ta ndal veten t\u00eb imagjinoj\u00eb q\u00eb mendja \u00ebsht\u00eb \u201cn\u00eb\u201d kok\u00ebt tona. Por meqen\u00ebse ky \u00ebsht\u00eb keqkonceptim dhe mendja nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gj\u00eb materiale, ne p\u00ebrdorim metafora, q\u00eb nxirren prej bot\u00ebs fizike, p\u00ebr t\u00eb menduar rreth funksionimit mendor. Koncepti i nj\u00eb fushe analitike huazon prej fizik\u00ebs n\u00eb mas\u00ebn q\u00eb krahason nd\u00ebrveprimin e forcave t\u00eb padukshme psikike me nd\u00ebrveprimin e forcave n\u00eb fusha t\u00eb tilla si fusha elektromanjetike dhe ajo e forc\u00ebs s\u00eb gravitetit. Metafora e fush\u00ebs analitike theksin e v\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyrat sesi fushat e forcave gjenerohen nga nd\u00ebrveprimi i \u201cpoleve\u201d t\u00eb ndryshme dhe n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn si forca tejet t\u00eb m\u00ebdha mund t\u00eb gjenerohen nga ngjarje q\u00eb jan\u00eb t\u00eb padukshme.<\/span><\/p>

Koncepti i t\u00eb tretit analitik \u00ebsht\u00eb metafor\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb analoge me \u201cteorin\u00eb e emergjenc\u00ebs\u201d, nj\u00eb grup idesh q\u00eb po zhvillohen rishtazi nga teoricien\u00eb n\u00eb shkencat natyrore. Teoria e emergjenc\u00ebs mban q\u00ebndrimin se materia dhe energjia e nj\u00eb kategorie ka potencial t\u00eb (ri)kombinohet n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra q\u00eb nxjerrin nj\u00eb produkt q\u00eb dallon t\u00ebr\u00ebsisht n\u00eb natyr\u00eb prej element\u00ebve q\u00eb kombinohen dhe p\u00ebr pasoj\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb plot\u00ebsisht i paparashikuesh\u00ebm. Shembulli m\u00eb dramatik i mundsh\u00ebm i \u201cemergjenc\u00ebs\u201d s\u00eb k\u00ebtij lloji \u00ebsht\u00eb krijimi i jet\u00ebs prej kombinimit t\u00eb kimikat\u00ebve dhe forcave elektrike t\u00eb pashpirt. Metafora e \u201ct\u00eb tretit analitik\u201d e v\u00eb theksin m\u00eb pak mbi fush\u00ebn e forc\u00ebs q\u00eb krijohet nga p\u00ebrvoja e vet\u00ebdijshme dhe e pavet\u00ebdijshme e dy njer\u00ebzve sesa n\u00eb krijimin e nj\u00eb mendjeje t\u00eb tret\u00eb, nj\u00eb subjektiviteti t\u00eb tret\u00eb, pra t\u00eb pareduktuesh\u00ebm n\u00eb shum\u00ebn e dy subjektiviteteve q\u00eb futen n\u00eb formimin e tij. \u00a0I treti analitik \u00ebsht\u00eb metafor\u00eb p\u00ebr krijimin e nj\u00eb mendjeje q\u00eb ka ekzistenc\u00eb t\u00eb vet\u00ebn dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb e aft\u00eb t\u00eb mendoj\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra q\u00eb asnj\u00ebri prej kontribuesve ndaj krijimit t\u00eb subjektit t\u00eb tret\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb i aft\u00eb t\u00eb gjeneroj\u00eb m\u00eb vete. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb d\u00ebgjon p\u00ebrshkrimin q\u00eb po i jap metafor\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb tretit analitik, ekziston nj\u00eb rrezik q\u00eb metafora t\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret tep\u00ebr konkretisht. P\u00ebr shembull, kur mendon konkretisht, dikush mund t\u00eb pyes\u00eb, \u201cA \u00ebsht\u00eb ky nj\u00eb person i tret\u00eb q\u00eb nuk ka trup?\u201d dhe \u201cA mundet nj\u00eb mendje e tret\u00eb pa trup t\u00eb ket\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb trupore?\u201d. Sigurisht, ta marr\u00ebsh metafor\u00ebn si fakt fizik prodhon k\u00ebto absurditete dhe t\u00eb tjera. \u00c7do metafor\u00eb mb\u00ebrrin pik\u00ebn e thyerjes s\u00eb vet kur shtrihet tep\u00ebr larg ose p\u00ebrdoret tep\u00ebr konkretisht. Me r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb kur p\u00ebrdorim metafora t\u00eb mbajm\u00eb mend se ato jan\u00eb vet\u00ebm metafora dhe se na duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim metafora t\u00eb tjera ose t\u00eb shpikim t\u00eb reja kur t\u00eb vjetrat mb\u00ebrrijn\u00eb pik\u00ebn e thyerjes ose kur b\u00ebhen bajat.<\/span>
Sigurisht q\u00eb metafora e fush\u00ebs analitike ka limitet e veta, po ashtu. N\u00ebqoft\u00ebse merret fjal\u00ebp\u00ebrfjalsh\u00ebm dhe jo metaforikisht, lindin pyetje absurde, si: \u00c7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb fush\u00eb force e mendjes? A \u201cb\u00ebn kontakt\u201d pavet\u00ebdija e nj\u00ebrit me at\u00eb t\u00eb tjetrit? \u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb \u201ckontakt\u201d n\u00eb nj\u00eb fush\u00eb mendore?<\/span><\/p>

P\u00ebr t\u00eb lexuar pjes\u00ebn e tret\u00eb kliko k\u00ebtu<\/a><\/strong><\/span>.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

P\u00ebrkthim | Genc Shehu | 16.03.2021| nyje.al Fotografi nga Moriah Wolfe publikuar ne Unsplash LDD: Tom, dashuria juaj p\u00ebr gjuh\u00ebn dhe let\u00ebrsin\u00eb provokon mendim. Isha duke lexuar librin tuaj t\u00eb fundit, Creative Readings\u00a0dhe m\u00eb p\u00eblqyen shum\u00eb komentar\u00ebt mbi tekste t\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjedhura t\u00eb Freud-it, Isaacs-it, Fairbairn-it, Winnicott-it, Bionit, Loewald-it dhe Searles-it. Po mendoj k\u00ebtu p\u00ebr dashurin\u00eb si m\u00ebnyr\u00eb zbulimi t\u00eb di\u00e7kaje t\u00eb re \u2013 n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, zbulimi i di\u00e7kaje t\u00eb re n\u00eb k\u00ebto tekste. Leximi yt \u00ebsht\u00eb bind\u00ebs, \u00e7el m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb reja t\u00eb kuptuari dhe ndri\u00e7on pik\u00ebn e err\u00ebt t\u00eb k\u00ebtyre mendimtar\u00ebve t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm. Duket sikur autor\u00ebt q\u00eb p\u00ebrzgjodhe qen\u00eb psikoanalist\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk kishin frik\u00eb t\u00eb shkonin p\u00ebrtej kanonit ekzistues. Ata ishin jokonformist\u00eb, mendimtar\u00eb t\u00eb pavarur, disi vizionar\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt po ashtu kishin nj\u00eb dashuri p\u00ebr paraardh\u00ebsit e tyre. A mund t\u00eb thoni di\u00e7ka m\u00eb shum\u00eb rreth pasionit tuaj p\u00ebr k\u00ebta autor\u00eb dhe se n\u00eb \u00e7\u2019m\u00ebnyr\u00eb i fusni n\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim si paraardh\u00ebsit tuaj psikoanalitik\u00eb? THO: Kur p\u00ebrdorni fraz\u00ebn paraardh\u00ebs psikoanalitik\u00eb, mendimi i par\u00eb q\u00eb m\u00eb nd\u00ebrmendet \u00ebsht\u00eb eseja e Borgesit ku ai thot\u00eb se Kafka krijoi paraardh\u00ebsit e vet. Mendoj se un\u00eb dhe t\u00eb gjith\u00eb lexuesit e tjer\u00eb krijojm\u00eb paraardh\u00ebsit tan\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb se ne gjejm\u00eb \u2013 ose ndofta krijojm\u00eb \u2013 vetveten n\u00eb shkrimet e t\u00eb par\u00ebve tan\u00eb. Gjejm\u00eb nj\u00eb potencial t\u00eb pasend\u00ebrtuar n\u00eb veprat e tyre prej t\u00eb cilit zbulojm\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm se kush ishin ata, por edhe kush jemi ne. N\u00eb dekad\u00ebn e kaluar, n\u00eb serin\u00eb e artikujve t\u00eb p\u00ebrmbledhur t\u00eb Creative readings, un\u00eb, pa ia shtruar ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb k\u00ebshtu vetes, kam krijuar vet\u00eb pem\u00ebn e familjes time psikoanalitike. Duke shkruar rreth vepr\u00ebs s\u00eb k\u00ebtyre autor\u00ebve un\u00eb kam deri diku rishkruar vepr\u00ebn e tyre n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb imja dhe n\u00eb nj\u00eb kuptim tjet\u00ebr, ata m\u00eb kan\u00eb rishkruar mua p\u00ebrmes ndikimit t\u00eb tyre mbi mua. E kam p\u00ebrdorur vepr\u00ebn e tyre n\u00eb bash t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb Winnicott-i p\u00ebrshkruan p\u00ebrdorimin q\u00eb foshnja i b\u00ebn t\u00eb \u00ebm\u00ebs si pasqyr\u00eb. M\u00eb lini t\u00eb shpjegohem se \u00e7\u2019dua t\u00eb them me k\u00ebt\u00eb krahasim. Idet\u00eb e Winnicott-it rreth funksionit pasqyr\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb zakon t\u00eb keqthuhen n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb jo vet\u00ebm \u00e7orienton, por edhe e shnd\u00ebrron di\u00e7ka thelb\u00ebsore p\u00ebr zhvillimin n\u00eb di\u00e7ka patologjike. Tep\u00ebr shpesh lexoj dhe d\u00ebgjoj analist\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruajn\u00eb rolin pasqyr\u00eb t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs si \u201cfoshnja q\u00eb sheh veten n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs\u201d. Winnicott n\u00eb fakt thot\u00eb se foshnja sheh \u201cdi\u00e7ka si\u00a0vetja\u201d n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs. Kjo e fundit \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb funksion simbolik n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin foshnja sheh veten t\u00eb transformuar\u00a0n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs \u2013 ai sheh interpretimin e vetes nga n\u00ebna, ose me fjal\u00eb t\u00eb tjera, foshnja sheh metafor\u00ebn q\u00eb ka krijuar n\u00ebna e tij p\u00ebr t\u00eb shprehur mbres\u00ebn q\u00eb foshnja e saj i ka l\u00ebn\u00eb. Ky transformim i vetes q\u00eb foshnja sheh n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs s\u00eb tij ekziston n\u00eb nj\u00eb sfer\u00eb joverbale simbolike. Foshnja q\u00eb foshnja sheh n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb imazhi i tij pasqyr\u00eb (dyt\u00ebshori i tij). N\u00eb vend t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj, ai sheh mbres\u00ebn, damk\u00ebn q\u00eb ai ka l\u00ebn\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb person tjet\u00ebr, nj\u00eb mbres\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebs n\u00ebna i ka dh\u00ebn\u00eb di\u00e7ka nga vetja. Prej k\u00ebtij k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrimi, p\u00ebrvoja e foshnj\u00ebs q\u00eb sheh di\u00e7ka si\u00a0vetja n\u00eb syt\u00eb e s\u00eb \u00ebm\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e lidhjes me dik\u00eb q\u00eb nuk\u00a0\u00ebsht\u00eb ai. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb, p\u00ebrvoja e pasqyrimit \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e ndarjes n\u00eb dy kuptime t\u00eb ndryshme. S\u00eb pari, ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e ndashm\u00ebris\u00eb prej n\u00ebn\u00ebs, e cila \u00ebsht\u00eb person m\u00eb vete q\u00eb b\u00ebn metafora nga ana e vet p\u00ebr p\u00ebrjetimin e saj t\u00eb foshnj\u00ebs. T\u00eb pakt\u00ebn me po aq r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi, p\u00ebrvoja e shikimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb varianti t\u00eb transformuar metaforikisht t\u00eb vetes n\u00eb syt\u00eb e dikujt tjet\u00ebr \u00ebsht\u00eb ngjarje vendimtare n\u00eb zhvillimin e vet\u00eb kapacitetit t\u00eb foshnj\u00ebs p\u00ebr nd\u00ebrgjegje, vet\u00ebdije t\u00eb vetes. N\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e foshnj\u00ebs teksa shikon \u00a0metafor\u00ebn q\u00eb n\u00ebna ka krijuar p\u00ebr p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e saj p\u00ebr t\u00eb, dy variante t\u00eb foshnj\u00ebs b\u00ebhen reale nj\u00ebkoh\u00ebsisht n\u00eb mendjen e foshnj\u00ebs: foshnja si vete q\u00eb percepton (un\u00eb) dhe foshnja si objekt i perceptimit t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs (mua). Hap\u00ebsira midis foshnj\u00ebs vrojtuese (un\u00eb) dhe foshnj\u00ebs s\u00eb vrojtuar i par\u00eb n\u00eb syt\u00eb e n\u00ebn\u00ebs (mua) \u00ebsht\u00eb hap\u00ebsira n\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebn p\u00ebrvoja e nd\u00ebrgjegjes lind, hap\u00ebsira ku foshnja \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00ebherazi vetja vrojtuese dhe vetja e vrojtuar. Un\u00eb gjej n\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e leximit t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs s\u00eb mendimtar\u00ebve t\u00eb m\u00ebdhenj analitik\u00eb di\u00e7ka nga p\u00ebrvoja e rolit pasqyr\u00eb q\u00eb po diskutoj. I shoh idet\u00eb e tyre si metafora p\u00ebr vet\u00eb mendimin tim (mendim q\u00eb ndodh n\u00eb procesin e leximit t\u00eb vepr\u00ebs s\u00eb tyre). Nuk mund ta theksoj mjaftuesh\u00ebm se bash n\u00eb idet\u00eb e tyre, ide q\u00eb nuk\u00a0jan\u00eb krijesa t\u00eb miat, gjej reflektime (transformime) t\u00eb vetes q\u00eb nuk i kam ditur m\u00eb par\u00eb. Pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebt\u00eb transformim t\u00eb vetes p\u00ebrdor q\u00eb t\u00eb rishkruaj vepr\u00ebn tyre n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb origjinale \u2013 pra, ajo \u00e7ka shkruaj \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00eb mendimi im, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00ebherazi i ndar\u00eb prej tyre (k\u00ebto jan\u00eb idet\u00eb e mia origjinale) dhe i pandar\u00eb prej tyre (idet\u00eb e mia jan\u00eb transformime t\u00eb t\u00eb tyreve). Th\u00ebn\u00eb edhe n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb tjet\u00ebr, ata m\u00eb kan\u00eb par\u00eb mua n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb un\u00eb ende nuk e kam par\u00eb veten; dhe un\u00eb i lexoj n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb ata ende nuk jan\u00eb par\u00eb. \u00cbsht\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kuptim q\u00eb un\u00eb krijoj vet\u00eb paraardh\u00ebsit e mi t\u00eb cil\u00ebt m\u00eb krijojn\u00eb mua teksa ua lexoj vepr\u00ebn. T\u00eb konceptohet k\u00ebshtu prejardhja \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb mohohet nocioni i koh\u00ebs rrept\u00ebsisht kronologjike. L\u00ebvizja e ndikimit (dhe koh\u00ebs) nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm nga e shkuara n\u00eb t\u00eb tashmen n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen. L\u00ebvizja e ndikimit dhe koh\u00ebs \u00ebsht\u00eb po ashtu nga e ardhmja n\u00eb t\u00eb tashmen n\u00eb t\u00eb shkuar\u00ebn. Ne q\u00eb jemi lexuesit aktual\u00eb t\u00eb Freud-it, Isaacs-it dhe Winnicott-it ndryshojm\u00eb t\u00eb shkuar\u00ebn (ia shnd\u00ebrrojm\u00eb vepr\u00ebn si\u00e7 e kishin kuptuar ata) n\u00eb aktin ton\u00eb t\u00eb tanish\u00ebm t\u00eb transformimit (rishpikjes) t\u00eb asaj q\u00eb shkruan ata. Mbi t\u00eb gjitha, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb veprat e tyre tonat, ne vijm\u00eb n\u00eb jet\u00eb si mendimtar\u00eb t\u00eb denj\u00eb m\u00eb vete, me idet\u00eb tona q\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb ardhmen do t\u2019i p\u00ebrdorin n\u00eb procesin e krijimit t\u00eb vetvetes n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb paimagjinueshme p\u00ebr ne tani. LDD:<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8363,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","podmotor_file_id":"","podmotor_episode_id":"","cover_image":"","cover_image_id":"","duration":"","filesize":"","filesize_raw":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","ocean_post_layout":"right-sidebar","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"ocs-kulture-category-post-sidebar","ocean_second_sidebar":"0","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"0","ocean_custom_header_template":"0","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"0","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"off","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,4],"tags":[18,82,174,259,260,317],"class_list":["post-8366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-kulture","category-kryenyje","tag-analist","tag-endrra","tag-letersi","tag-psikanalize","tag-psikologji","tag-thomas-h-ogden","entry","has-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8366"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8366\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25600,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8366\/revisions\/25600"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}