{"id":8362,"date":"2021-03-17T12:39:00","date_gmt":"2021-03-17T10:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nyje.al\/?p=8362"},"modified":"2024-09-13T12:31:46","modified_gmt":"2024-09-13T10:31:46","slug":"nje-bisede-me-thomas-h-ogden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/nje-bisede-me-thomas-h-ogden\/","title":{"rendered":"Nj\u00eb bised\u00eb me Thomas H. Ogden"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

P\u00ebrkthim | 16.03.2021 | Genc Shehu | nyje.al <\/strong><\/span><\/p>

\"Photo<\/span> Fotografi nga Riley Pitzen ne platformen Unsplash<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Thomas Ogden \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb psikoanalist i shquar amerikan me kontribute t\u00eb shumta n\u00eb teorin\u00eb dhe praktik\u00ebn psikoanalitike.  Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht i njohur p\u00ebr zhvillimin e disa koncepteve t\u00eb lidhura me kund\u00ebrtransferenc\u00ebn dhe identifikimin projektues si jo vet\u00ebm mekaniz\u00ebm mbrojt\u00ebs dhe mjet komunikimi, por edhe si teknik\u00eb e metod\u00eb e nd\u00ebrhyrjes s\u00eb posa\u00e7me psikoanalitike. Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar po ashtu p\u00ebr disa shkrime e libra n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e krijimtatis\u00eb artistike n\u00eb form\u00ebn e romanit trillues. <\/strong>Kjo intervist\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb nga libri i tij i fundit “Reclaiming Unlived Life”, ku p\u00ebrmblidhen disa nga eset\u00eb e tij nd\u00ebr vite.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Luca Di Donna<\/em>: Cilat qen\u00eb burimet e frym\u00ebzimit p\u00ebr ju n\u00eb pun\u00ebn tuaj t\u00eb hershme q\u00eb ju \u00e7uan t\u00eb p\u00ebrqafoni teorin\u00eb britanike t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve objektuale t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm? A ndodhi p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb mospajtimeve me tradit\u00ebn amerikane t\u00eb psikologjis\u00eb s\u00eb egos apo qe vet\u00eb p\u00ebrvoja e pun\u00ebs suaj me pacient\u00eb q\u00eb ju \u00e7oi n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rrug\u00eb?<\/span><\/p>\n

Thomas H. Ogden<\/em>: Luca, fillova t\u00eb interesohesha n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00eb p\u00ebrpara se t\u00eb kisha nj\u00eb em\u00ebr p\u00ebr t\u00eb. N\u00ebna ime ishte n\u00eb analiz\u00eb kur un\u00eb isha f\u00ebmij\u00eb i vog\u00ebl. Ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb grua e ndjeshme dhe inteligjente, k\u00ebshtuq\u00eb nuk m\u00eb fliste rreth psikoanaliz\u00ebs, por ajo m\u00eb d\u00ebgjonte dhe m\u00eb fliste prej p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs s\u00eb saj n\u00eb analiz\u00eb. P\u00ebrftova nj\u00ebfar\u00eb gjuhe p\u00ebr ndjeshm\u00ebrin\u00eb q\u00eb ajo sillte n\u00eb kujdesin m\u00ebm\u00ebsor vet\u00ebm kur isha 16 vje\u00e7, n\u00eb gjimnaz, kur m\u2019u dha nj\u00eb list\u00eb librash prej t\u00eb cil\u00ebve t\u00eb lexoja tre p\u00ebr leximet e ver\u00ebs. Prej librave sugjeruar, un\u00eb zgjodha Nj\u00eb hyrje e p\u00ebrgjithshme n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00eb<\/em> t\u00eb Freud-it. M\u00eb kujtohet q\u00eb fillova ta lexoj n\u00eb autobus n\u00eb qytetin e New York-ut dhe se si u p\u00ebrfshiva aq shum\u00eb saq\u00eb humba stacionin, \u00e7ka nuk m\u00eb bezdisi fare meqen\u00ebse k\u00ebshtu do mund t\u00eb lexoja pa u shqet\u00ebsuar p\u00ebr aq koh\u00eb sa t\u00eb desha. M\u00eb shushati m\u00eb shum\u00eb z\u00ebri n\u00eb lib\u00ebr sesa idet\u00eb. Libri qe shkruar si nj\u00eb leksion imagjinar drejtuar d\u00ebgjuesve skeptik\u00eb. M\u00ebnyra se si Freud-i i flet audienc\u00ebs p\u00ebr dyshimet e tyre dhe frik\u00ebrat sa i p\u00ebrket asaj q\u00eb ai po thot\u00eb ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb interesante p\u00ebr mua, at\u00ebher\u00eb dhe tani, se ideja \u2013 p\u00ebr shembull, psikologjia e pavet\u00ebdijshme e shakas\u00eb, qoft\u00eb edhe psikologjia e pavet\u00ebdijshme e \u00ebndrrave. A thua se e dija sakaq p\u00ebrmbajtjen e ideve \u2013 p\u00ebr mua ndihej sikur isha takuar me iden\u00eb e t\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijshmes q\u00eb prej koh\u00ebs kur m\u00ebsova t\u00eb flisja, ndofta edhe m\u00eb her\u00ebt.<\/span><\/p>\n

N\u00eb prapashikim, mendoj se kishte dy arsye p\u00ebrse z\u00ebri n\u00eb lib\u00ebr ishte gj\u00ebja q\u00eb m\u00eb interesonte m\u00eb shum\u00eb \u2013 me gjas\u00eb kishte shum\u00eb arsye, por do p\u00ebrmend vet\u00ebm dy. S\u00eb pari, z\u00ebri \u00ebsht\u00eb krijim letrar dhe un\u00eb e dashuroja shkrimin e Freud-it si shkrim. Dashuroja \u00e7far\u00ebdo shkrimtarie t\u00eb mir\u00eb nga e cila mendja ime 16-vje\u00e7are mund t\u00eb prekej.<\/span>
Arsyeja tjet\u00ebr p\u00ebrse e thitha z\u00ebrin n\u00eb lib\u00ebr me kaq zell dhe gatishm\u00ebri ishte, ma ha mendja, se ndihej sikur z\u00ebri q\u00eb po d\u00ebgjoja n\u00eb lib\u00ebr ishte z\u00ebri i analistit t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs time, nj\u00eb z\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin isha shum\u00eb kureshtar dhe, sigurisht, nuk e kisha d\u00ebgjuar kurr\u00eb drejt\u00ebp\u00ebrs\u00ebdrejti por sidoqoft\u00eb e kisha n\u00eb kock\u00eb. Pra, prezantimi im me psikoanaliz\u00ebn ndodhi p\u00ebrmes marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve objektuale \u2013 marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia ime e hershme me n\u00ebn\u00ebn time dhe, p\u00ebrmes saj, marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia ime e hershme me analistin e saj dhe me psikoanaliz\u00ebn. Kjo p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e hershme me psikoanaliz\u00ebn ishte e nj\u00eb lloji t\u00eb pafjal\u00eb, lloj ky q\u00eb kishte t\u00eb b\u00ebnte me vet\u00eb qenien time dhe me vet\u00eb qenien e n\u00ebn\u00ebs time.<\/span><\/p>\n

Nuk i jam p\u00ebrgjigjur drejtp\u00ebrdrejt pyetjes, por kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00ebnyra m\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb q\u00eb mund t\u00eb filloj t\u00eb tregoj tregimin. Pasi \u201czbulova\u201d psikoanaliz\u00ebn, ose pasi m\u00eb zbuloi, kam lexuar disi kuturu libra q\u00eb hasja. Libri i dyt\u00eb psikoanalitik ishte Dashuria primare dhe teknika psikoanalitike<\/em> e Balint-it, sepse qe i vetmi lib\u00ebr mbi psikoanaliz\u00ebn n\u00eb bibliotek\u00ebn e zon\u00ebs. Mund t\u00eb ndieja m\u00ebnyrat se si z\u00ebri dhe stili i shkrimit i k\u00ebtij libri dallonte shum\u00eb prej z\u00ebrit dhe stilit t\u00eb Freud-it. Balint-i po merrej me format e hershme t\u00eb dashuris\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa Freud-i merakun e kishte me format e hershme t\u00eb seksualitetit. Edhe n\u00eb at\u00eb mosh\u00eb t\u00eb re, dashuria m\u00eb dukej ngjarje m\u00eb njer\u00ebzore sa diseksioni i seksualitetit ku qe futur Freud-i.<\/span><\/p>\n

Vendosa t\u00eb shkoj n\u00eb mjek\u00ebsi sepse, asokohe, vet\u00ebm doktor\u00ebt mjek\u00ebsor\u00eb pranoheshin n\u00eb institute psikoanalitike t\u00eb lidhura me Shoqat\u00ebn Amerikane Psikoanalitike e cila mbizot\u00ebronte n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00ebn amerikane. Nuk e dija se kishte ca institute q\u00eb pranonin kandidat\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk ishin mjek\u00eb. Nuk jam i sigurt q\u00eb nuk do ta merrja udh\u00ebn mjek\u00ebsore edhe n\u00ebse do kisha qen\u00eb i vet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm q\u00eb do mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhesha psikoanalist pa t\u00eb. Mendoj se trajnimi mjek\u00ebsor ka vler\u00eb n\u00eb praktik\u00ebn e psikoanaliz\u00ebs. P\u00ebr mua, ajo q\u00eb kishte r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi n\u00eb trajnimin mjek\u00ebsor qe p\u00ebrvoja e marrjes p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr jet\u00ebn e pacientit n\u00eb kuptimin e fjal\u00ebp\u00ebrfjalsh\u00ebm. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi tejet e madhe dhe mendoj se disa analist\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqen ta mohojn\u00eb n\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien e tyre me pacient\u00ebt e tyre. Shumic\u00ebn e koh\u00ebs, n\u00eb praktik\u00ebn psikoanalitike, pacient\u00ebt jan\u00eb plot\u00ebsisht t\u00eb aft\u00eb t\u00eb marrin p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr jet\u00ebt e tyre. Por kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb k\u00ebshtu. P\u00ebr shembull, pacient\u00eb skizofren\u00eb dhe pacient\u00eb me tipe t\u00eb tjer\u00eb psikozash, si dhe pacient\u00eb t\u00eb depresuar dhe vet\u00ebvras\u00ebs, shpesh nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb aft\u00eb t\u00eb marrin p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr jet\u00ebt e tyre. Shum\u00eb analist\u00eb dhe psikoterapist\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt i kam trajtuar ose q\u00eb jan\u00eb k\u00ebshilluar me mua, kan\u00eb frik\u00eb prej k\u00ebsaj lloj p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsie dhe rreken ta shmangin duke mos marr\u00eb pacient\u00eb psikotik\u00eb apo vet\u00ebvras\u00ebs. Fatkeq\u00ebsisht, edhe p\u00ebr pacientin edhe p\u00ebr analistin, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithnj\u00eb e mundur t\u00eb parashikohet se cili pacient do t\u00eb b\u00ebhet psikotik apo vet\u00ebvras\u00ebs p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb terapis\u00eb ose analiz\u00ebs. N\u00eb fakt, un\u00eb besoj se \u00e7do p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb analitike q\u00eb ia vlen p\u00ebrfshin gjendje ndijimore psikotike dhe thell\u00ebsisht t\u00eb depresuara, dhe k\u00ebto gjendje shmangen nga analist\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt kan\u00eb frik\u00eb t\u00eb marrin p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr jet\u00ebt e pacient\u00ebve t\u00eb tyre.<\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00ebr ta sjell\u00eb s\u00ebrish bised\u00ebn te pyetja juaj rreth psikologjis\u00eb amerikane t\u00eb egos dhe teoris\u00eb britanike t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve objektuale, mendoj se analist\u00ebt e k\u00ebsaj t\u00eb dyt\u00ebs \u2013 p\u00ebr shembull Winnicott, Fairbairn, Milner, Bion, Rosenfeld dhe Segal, sa p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrmendur pak prej tyre \u2013 jan\u00eb shum\u00eb m\u00eb t\u00eb gatsh\u00ebm t\u00eb adresojn\u00eb pacientin psikotik dhe aspektin psikotik t\u00eb \u00e7do pacienti se \u00e7\u2019jan\u00eb t\u00eb gatsh\u00ebm psikolog\u00ebt amerikan\u00eb t\u00eb egos. Ky qe nj\u00eb aspekt i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm pse m\u00eb t\u00ebrhoqi teoria britanike e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve objektuale. Q\u00eb prej fillimit t\u00eb trajnimit tim si rezident, kam qen\u00eb thell\u00ebsisht i interesuar n\u00eb trajtimin e pacient\u00ebve me turbullime serioze dhe kam kaluar nj\u00eb goxha pjes\u00eb t\u00eb karrier\u00ebs time si analist jo vet\u00ebm duke trajtuar pacient\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb, por po ashtu duke u dh\u00ebn\u00eb m\u00ebsim dhe mbik\u00ebqyrje terapist\u00ebve q\u00eb trajtonin k\u00ebt\u00eb grup pacient\u00ebsh.<\/span><\/p>\n

LDD<\/em>: Ju keni shkruar mbi nj\u00eb larmi t\u00eb madhe temash. Kam b\u00ebr\u00eb nj\u00eb list\u00eb t\u00eb pjesshme t\u00eb interesave t\u00eb gjerave q\u00eb keni, t\u00eb cilat, n\u00ebse m\u00eb lejoni t\u2019ju lexoj k\u00ebt\u00eb list\u00eb n\u00eb rend p\u00ebraf\u00ebrsisht kronologjik, p\u00ebrfshijn\u00eb: koncepti i identifikimit projektues; trajtimi psikoanalitik i skizofrenis\u00eb; pragu i kompleksit mashkullor dhe fem\u00ebror t\u00eb Edipit; takimi nistor analitik; pozicionet klajniane; hap\u00ebsira potenciale e Winnicott-it; koncepti i marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve t\u00eb brendshme objektuale; subjektet frojdiane, klajniane dhe uinikotiane; i treti analitik; fanitjet ose \u00ebnd\u00ebrritjet [reverie<\/em>]; mosnjohja; pozicioni puqit\u00ebs-autik [autistic-contiguous<\/em>]; mbik\u00ebqyrja psikoanalitike; dh\u00ebnia m\u00ebsim e psikoanaliz\u00ebs; shkrimet psikoanalitike; ashtu sikurse nj\u00eb seri shkrimesh n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat diskutoni proz\u00ebn dhe poezin\u00eb e Frost-it, Borgesit, Stenvesit, William Carlos Williams-it dhe Kafk\u00ebs; plus nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr seri shkrimesh n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat ju shkruani rreth m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs unike t\u00eb leximit t\u00eb shkrimtar\u00ebve analitik\u00eb, si Freud, Isaacs, Fairbairn, Winnicott, Bion, Loewald dhe Searles. Nuk ia kam dal\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrmend shum\u00eb shkrime t\u00eb tjera mbi tema po ashtu t\u00eb tjera. Kur shihni pas mbi pothuaj dyzet vjet shkrime n\u00eb t\u00eb cilat je angazhuar, a sheh nj\u00eb \u201cprojekt\u201d ose \u201cvij\u00eb zhvillimi\u201d n\u00eb vepr\u00ebn tuaj?<\/span><\/p>\n

THO<\/em>: Luca, pata shpresuar q\u00eb do t\u2019i ruaje pyetjet e v\u00ebshtira p\u00ebr n\u00eb fund t\u00eb intervist\u00ebs. K\u00ebt\u00eb pyetje ia kam shtruar vetes shum\u00eb her\u00eb. Ideja se duhen t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn dy vet\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb menduar \u00ebsht\u00eb e para q\u00eb m\u00eb vjen n\u00eb mendje. Merrem me at\u00eb ide n\u00eb shkrimet e mia t\u00eb hershme mbi identifikimin projektues. Tashm\u00eb nuk e p\u00ebrdor shpesh termin [identifikm projektues] sepse secili ka p\u00ebrkufizimin e vet t\u00eb tij, k\u00ebshtuq\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqem ta p\u00ebrshkruaj dukurin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb cil\u00ebn flas n\u00eb vend se t\u00eb p\u00ebrdor termin q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb zhveshur prej kuptimit. Ajo \u00e7ka kam n\u00eb mendje kur flas p\u00ebr at\u00eb q\u00eb dikur e quaja \u201cidentifikim projektues\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb, n\u00eb foshnj\u00ebri, n\u00ebna dhe foshnja q\u00eb krijojn\u00eb nj\u00eb mendje t\u00eb tret\u00eb kundrejt s\u00eb cil\u00ebs secili kontribuon dhe prej s\u00eb cil\u00ebs secilit i p\u00ebrngjitet dometh\u00ebnie individuale. T\u00eb dy u jepen k\u00ebtij t\u00eb treti, duke ruajtur n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn koh\u00eb identitetet e tyre individuale, tashm\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshuara nga p\u00ebrvoja e t\u00eb jetuarit tek i treti.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mendimi i mir\u00ebfillt\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithnj\u00eb n\u00eb l\u00ebvizje, \u201cduke ikur\u201d, si\u00e7 thot\u00eb William James. James-i, n\u00eb 1900-n, nj\u00ebkohsh\u00ebm me botimin e Interpretimit t\u00eb \u00ebndrrave<\/em>, ngulmonte q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb p\u00ebrdorim folje, ndajfolje, parafjal\u00eb dhe lidh\u00ebza, e jo emra dhe mbiemra, p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar \u00e7do ngjarje psikike, meqen\u00ebse \u00e7do dukuri psikike \u00ebsht\u00eb vazhdimisht n\u00eb ndryshim. Si\u00e7 ka th\u00ebn\u00eb James-i \u2013 psikologu m\u00eb i n\u00ebnvler\u00ebsuar n\u00eb literatur\u00ebn analitike \u2013 na duhet t\u00eb kemi fjal\u00eb p\u00ebr ndjenjat e por<\/em>-it, p\u00ebr ndjenjat e dhe<\/em>-s\u00eb dhe ndjenjat e e<\/em>-s\u00eb. Un\u00eb do ta shtroja n\u00eb terma paksa t\u00eb tjer\u00eb: Ne nuk kemi kujtime, ne mbajm\u00eb mend trishtuesh\u00ebm, zbeht\u00eb, p\u00ebrhumbsh\u00ebm e k\u00ebshtu me radh\u00eb, dhe k\u00ebto m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb mbamenduri na transformojn\u00eb teksa ne i transformojm\u00eb ato, mbytemi n\u00eb to dhe kthehemi n\u00eb vete n\u00eb nj\u00eb form\u00eb q\u00eb dallon nga \u00e7\u2019kemi qen\u00eb dhe ende \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb proces shnd\u00ebrrimi. Ndryshimi \u00ebsht\u00eb konstantja e vetme n\u00eb gjendjet psikologjike.<\/span><\/p>\n

Konceptimi i t\u00eb menduarit dhe t\u00eb ndjerit nd\u00ebrsubjektiv q\u00eb po p\u00ebrshkruaj p\u00ebrb\u00ebn themelin e asaj q\u00eb p\u00ebrfundova ta quaj \u201ci treti analitik\u201d, i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb koncept q\u00eb m\u00eb duhet ta rizbuloj \u00e7do her\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb patur ndonj\u00ebfar\u00eb kuptimi p\u00ebr mua. Ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb, kur lexoj p\u00ebrdorimin e t\u00eb tjer\u00ebve t\u00eb termit i treti analitik<\/em>, fenomeni q\u00eb ata p\u00ebrshkruajn\u00eb mua m\u00eb duket i ri. Fakti q\u00eb nuk shquaj vet\u00eb mendimin tim n\u00eb interpretimin q\u00eb i b\u00ebn nj\u00eb person tjet\u00ebr konceptit t\u00eb t\u00eb tretit analitik, \u00ebsht\u00eb ngjarje q\u00eb e mir\u00ebpres sepse do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se interpretimi i konceptit ka qen\u00eb ushqyes p\u00ebr mendimin e dikujt tjet\u00ebr \u2013 kjo, tek e fundit, \u00ebsht\u00eb arsyeja kryesore e \u00e7far\u00ebdolloj t\u00eb shkruari. Lexuesi i romanit i krijon personazhet, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb edhe arsyeja p\u00ebrse p\u00ebr mua \u00ebsht\u00eb pothuajse gjithmon\u00eb zhg\u00ebnjyese t\u00eb shikoj nj\u00eb film t\u00eb bazuar n\u00eb nj\u00eb roman q\u00eb kam p\u00eblqyer \u2013 personazhet n\u00eb film shpesh vrasin vet\u00eb imazhet e mia t\u00eb personazheve t\u00eb romanit dhe mbes me imazhet e dikujt tjet\u00ebr, q\u00eb nuk kan\u00eb shum\u00eb lidhje me personazhet q\u00eb autori dhe un\u00eb kemi krijuar.<\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00eb tjer\u00eb, p\u00ebrfshi [Madeleine dhe Willy] Baranger, Ferro, Civitarese, Chianese dhe Bolognini, kan\u00eb p\u00ebrdorur metafor\u00ebn e fush\u00ebs analitike p\u00ebr t\u2019iu referuar dy personave q\u00eb mendojn\u00eb bashk\u00eb \u2013 duke jetuar n\u00eb nj\u00eb bot\u00eb forcash t\u00eb bashk\u00ebnd\u00ebrtuara psikologjike dhe somatike t\u00eb cilat diktojn\u00eb m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb caktuara t\u00eb kuptim\u00ebsimit t\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs s\u00eb dikujt, si ajo merr dometh\u00ebnie. Ideja e nj\u00eb fushe dhe ideja e nj\u00eb subjekti t\u00eb tret\u00eb jan\u00eb thjesht metafora p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruar aspekte t\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs analitike, marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien n\u00ebn\u00eb-foshnj\u00eb dhe shum\u00eb p\u00ebrvoja t\u00eb tjera intime emocionale. Kjo nuk do t\u00eb thot\u00eb ama se dy metaforat p\u00ebrshkruajn\u00eb dukuri t\u00eb nj\u00ebjta. Nuk ka dy metafora q\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruajn\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn gj\u00eb \u2013 e gjith\u00eb ideja e p\u00ebrdorimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb metafore \u00ebsht\u00eb me krijue nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb unike t\u00eb p\u00ebrshkrimit t\u00eb nj\u00eb gj\u00ebje duke e krahasuar at\u00eb me nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr. Fusha e forc\u00ebs nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb subjekt i tret\u00eb \u2013 idet\u00eb kan\u00eb lidhje, por secila e sheh p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn e t\u00eb menduarit bashk\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra t\u00eb ndryshme. P\u00ebr mua, n\u00eb var\u00ebsi t\u00eb natyr\u00ebs s\u00eb posa\u00e7me t\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs q\u00eb pacienti dhe un\u00eb po kemi gjat\u00eb seanc\u00ebs analitike, nj\u00ebra metafor\u00eb ose tjetra ngjan se e p\u00ebrshkruan m\u00eb mir\u00eb at\u00eb \u00e7ka po ndodh; shum\u00eb shpesh, duket sikur asnj\u00ebra nuk funksionon. Un\u00eb mendoj n\u00eb k\u00ebto terma konceptual\u00eb pas nj\u00eb seance, ose (p\u00ebr mir\u00eb a keq) gjat\u00eb nj\u00eb seance kur rrekem t\u00eb gjej pik\u00ebmb\u00ebshtetje jasht\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs q\u00eb kam me pacientin.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mua m\u00eb duket se idet\u00eb q\u00eb kam shtjelluar p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb jet\u00ebs sime si shkrimtar analitik jan\u00eb t\u00eb pandashme prej nj\u00ebra-tjetr\u00ebs. P\u00ebr shembull, nj\u00eb \u00e7ast m\u00eb par\u00eb, kur po flisnim rreth ides\u00eb q\u00eb duhen dy ose m\u00eb shum\u00eb njer\u00ebz p\u00ebr t\u00eb menduar, u gjegja t\u00eb flisja p\u00ebr p\u00ebrdorimin e foljeve, ndajfoljeve, parafjal\u00ebve, lidh\u00ebzave dhe p\u00ebr natyr\u00ebn e metaforave. Interesi im n\u00eb gjuh\u00eb dhe interesi im n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00eb jan\u00eb zhvilluar si pjes\u00eb t\u00eb pashqitshme t\u00eb nj\u00eb t\u00eb t\u00ebre.<\/span><\/p>\n

LDD<\/em>: P\u00ebr t\u00eb vazhduar bised\u00ebn e rolit t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00eb, do t\u00eb isha i interesuar t\u00eb d\u00ebgjoja mendimet tuaja mbi r\u00ebnd\u00ebsin\u00eb e shkrimit p\u00ebr ju si analist. Q\u00eb shkrimi ka nj\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb ve\u00e7ant\u00eb p\u00ebr ju, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb e qart\u00eb. Analist\u00eb italian\u00eb kan\u00eb patur interes n\u00eb idet\u00eb konceptuale t\u00eb shkrimit n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00eb prej shum\u00eb vitesh \u2013 si n\u00eb vepr\u00ebn e Ferros, Racalbutos dhe Semit. Vepra juaj ka patur shum\u00eb ndikim n\u00eb komunitetin psikoanalitik italian \u2013 jo vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr kthjellt\u00ebsin\u00eb e proz\u00ebs suaj, por po ashtu p\u00ebr p\u00ebrfshirjen afektive me lexuesin. A mund t\u00eb thoni di\u00e7ka rreth pyetjes se \u00e7far\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie ka, p\u00ebr ju, midis leximit t\u00eb let\u00ebrsis\u00eb dhe praktik\u00ebs s\u00eb analiz\u00ebs?<\/span><\/p>\n

THO<\/em>: Luca, let\u00ebrsia ka qen\u00eb pasion i imi gjat\u00eb gjith\u00eb jet\u00ebs sime dhe duket se po b\u00ebhet edhe m\u00eb e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme teksa plakem. Psikoanaliz\u00ebn dhe let\u00ebrsin\u00eb i shoh q\u00eb kan\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebt nj\u00eb dashuri dhe respekt t\u00eb thell\u00eb p\u00ebr gjuh\u00ebn si mjet jo vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr shprehjen<\/em> e mendimeve dhe ndjenjave por, q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme, si medium p\u00ebr krijimin<\/em> e mendimeve dhe ndjenjave. Ne, n\u00eb nj\u00eb kuptim t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm, ne p\u00ebrb\u00ebhemi prej fjal\u00ebsh. E shnd\u00ebrrojm\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebn ton\u00eb n\u00eb mendime dhe ndjenja m\u00eb s\u00eb shumti p\u00ebrmes mediumit t\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs. Ashtu si e kan\u00eb demonstruar Bioni dhe Ferro, secili n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e vet, imazheria vizuale n\u00eb \u00ebnd\u00ebrrim \u2013 edhe kur jemi zgjuar edhe n\u00eb gjum\u00eb \u2013 kryen nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb shnd\u00ebrrimit prej p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs bruto n\u00eb kuptim personal. Por un\u00eb mendoj se nocioni i Freud-it p\u00ebr transformimin e paraqitje-gj\u00eb n\u00eb paraqitje-fjal\u00eb (n\u00eb transformimin e p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs s\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijshme n\u00eb p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb t\u00eb paravet\u00ebdijshme) \u00ebsht\u00eb po aq i r\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm n\u00eb krijimin e p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs vetjake. Un\u00eb mendoj se roli i gjuh\u00ebs n\u00eb krijimtarin\u00eb njer\u00ebzore (si p\u00ebrkund\u00ebr shprehjes njer\u00ebzore) vler\u00ebsohet nga shkrimtar\u00eb let\u00ebrsie dhe nga psikoanalist\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra shum\u00eb t\u00eb ngjashme.<\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00ebr ta \u00e7uar nj\u00eb hap m\u00eb tutje iden\u00eb se gjuha na b\u00ebn njer\u00ebz, mendoj se n\u00ebqoft\u00ebse ne, si analist\u00eb, duam t\u2019i p\u00ebrgjigjemi asaj q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb posa\u00e7\u00ebrisht njer\u00ebzore p\u00ebr secilin prej pacient\u00ebve tan\u00eb, na duhet t\u00eb zhvillojm\u00eb me pacientin nj\u00eb bised\u00eb analitike q\u00eb nuk do t\u00eb mund ta b\u00ebnim me asnj\u00eb njeri tjet\u00ebr n\u00eb bot\u00eb. \u00c7ka po them \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb fakt shum\u00eb e njohur p\u00ebr t\u00eb gjith\u00eb ne, qofshim n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e sh\u00ebndetit mendor ose jo: ne i flasim bashk\u00ebshortit ose partnerit ton\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb nuk i flasim askujt tjet\u00ebr n\u00eb bot\u00eb. Nuk po i referohem asaj q\u00eb<\/em> themi, por m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs se si flasim<\/em>. Po k\u00ebshtu, me shokun ton\u00eb t\u00eb ngusht\u00eb, me vajz\u00ebn ton\u00eb t\u00eb madhe, me vajz\u00ebn ton\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl, me v\u00ebllan\u00eb, me baban\u00eb, me n\u00ebn\u00ebn \u2013 me \u00e7do person me t\u00eb cilin kemi marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie intime \u2013 flasim n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb q\u00eb as nuk do ta \u00ebnd\u00ebrronim t\u00eb flisnim me ask\u00ebnd tjet\u00ebr n\u00eb bot\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00ebr m\u00eb tep\u00ebr, fjala \u00ebnd\u00ebrr<\/em> q\u00eb p\u00ebrdora paq\u00ebllimsh\u00ebm ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb shum\u00eb me m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn unike se si i flasim njer\u00ebzve t\u00eb ndrysh\u00ebm n\u00eb jet\u00ebn ton\u00eb. Kjo vlen edhe p\u00ebr bisedat me pacient\u00ebt tan\u00eb. Un\u00eb do t\u00eb shpresoja se, n\u00ebse nj\u00ebri prej pacient\u00ebve t\u00eb mi do t\u00eb m\u00eb d\u00ebgjonte n\u00eb ndonj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb flisja me nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr nga pacient\u00ebt e mi, ai ose ajo do t\u00eb thoshte, \u201cNuk m\u00eb p\u00eblqen m\u00ebnyra si po flet. Jo se je josh\u00ebs ose prind\u00ebror, ose i shtyn me zor \u2013 thjesht nuk m\u00eb ting\u00ebllon n\u00eb rregull.\u201d Un\u00eb do thoja, \u201cKjo \u00ebsht\u00eb ajo q\u00eb do shpresoja q\u00eb ti t\u00eb thoje. Nuk ishte p\u00ebr ty, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7ka q\u00eb ti dhe un\u00eb e krijuam bashk\u00eb. Nuk e \u00ebnd\u00ebrruam s\u00ebbashku.\u201d P\u00ebr mua, t\u00eb krijosh nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb posa\u00e7me t\u00eb foluri me pacientin nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb parakusht p\u00ebr pun\u00ebn analitike, kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb<\/em> puna analitike. Kur nj\u00eb pacient mund t\u00eb \u201cflas\u00eb hapur\u201d, ai krijon vetveten \u2013 krijon nj\u00eb vete q\u00eb ndihet si vetja e tij. Kur t\u00eb ket\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb mjaft rrug\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb, ai do t\u00eb jet\u00eb i aft\u00eb t\u2019i flas\u00eb vetes n\u00eb \u00ebnd\u00ebrrimet e tij (n\u00eb mediumin e imazheve vizuale) dhe t\u00eb flas\u00eb (n\u00eb m\u00ebnyra verbale dhe joverbale) me t\u00eb tjer\u00eb me t\u00eb cil\u00ebt ka marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnie intime. K\u00ebto biseda e vijojn\u00eb analiz\u00ebn e tij, pra, vazhdojn\u00eb ta sjellin pacientin n\u00eb ekzistenc\u00eb p\u00ebrmes medies s\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs imazhore dhe asaj verbale.<\/span><\/p>\n

Transferenca \u00ebsht\u00eb tem\u00eb bisede, q\u00eb me raste nidhmon shum\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb kuptuar di\u00e7ka prej asaj q\u00eb po e parandalon pacientin nga t\u00eb \u201cflas\u00eb hapur\u201d. Nuk m\u00eb duket se termi interpretim<\/em> e p\u00ebrshkruan mir\u00eb se si i flas pacient\u00ebve. Mendoj se fraza \u201cbised\u00eb me pacientin\u201d e rrok m\u00eb mir\u00eb ndjesin\u00eb e bisedave q\u00eb kam me pacient\u00eb se sa fraza \u201ct\u00eb b\u00ebsh nj\u00eb interpretim\u201d. E marr si l\u00ebvdat\u00eb t\u00eb lart\u00eb kur pacienti m\u00eb pyet, \u201cP\u00ebrse nuk b\u00ebn ndonj\u00ebher\u00eb interpretime?\u201d Kjo, p\u00ebr mua, nuk do t\u00eb thot\u00eb q\u00eb nuk po mendoj psikoanalitikisht; por do t\u00eb thot\u00eb se nuk po flas psikoanalitikisht. T\u00eb flas\u00ebsh psikoanalitikisht \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb flas\u00ebsh n\u00eb gjuh\u00eb t\u00eb huaj, nj\u00eb gjuh\u00eb q\u00eb nuk e kam krijuar un\u00eb. Un\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqem t\u00eb flas n\u00eb vet\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn time, megjith\u00ebse kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb shum\u00eb e v\u00ebshtir\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebhet.<\/span><\/p>\n

Ideja e z\u00ebrit unik na sjell s\u00ebrish te ndikimi q\u00eb ka, mbi mendimin dhe pun\u00ebn time si analist, leximi i poezis\u00eb dhe i trillimeve artistike. P\u00ebr me m\u00ebsue se \u00e7\u2019do t\u00eb thot\u00eb t\u00eb flas\u00ebsh n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn t\u00ebnde, nuk ka vend m\u00eb t\u00eb mir\u00eb ku t\u00eb shkosh se sa te shkrimtar\u00ebt e m\u00ebdhenj. Askush n\u00eb historin\u00eb e bot\u00ebs nuk ka shkruar si Borgesi. N\u00ebse dikush do ta b\u00ebnte k\u00ebt\u00eb, ai thjesht do t\u00eb ishte imitues i Borgesit. E nj\u00ebta vlen p\u00ebr Kafk\u00ebn, Calvino-n, Homerin, Coetzee-n, Wordsworth-in, Melville-in, Beckett-in dhe Frostin \u2013 p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrmendur vet\u00ebm nj\u00eb grusht nga shkrimtar\u00ebt e mi t\u00eb parap\u00eblqyer. Te k\u00ebta dhe shkrimtar\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebdhenj shkoj kur dua jo vet\u00ebm t\u00eb d\u00ebshmoj, por edhe t\u00eb marr\u00eb pjes\u00eb n\u00eb, krijimin e nj\u00eb gjuhe timen.<\/span><\/p>\n

P\u00ebr t\u00eb lexuar pjes\u00ebn e dyt\u00eb kliko k\u00ebtu<\/a><\/span><\/strong>. <\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

P\u00ebrkthim | 16.03.2021 | Genc Shehu | nyje.al  Fotografi nga Riley Pitzen ne platformen Unsplash Thomas Ogden \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb psikoanalist i shquar amerikan me kontribute t\u00eb shumta n\u00eb teorin\u00eb dhe praktik\u00ebn psikoanalitike.  Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht i njohur p\u00ebr zhvillimin e disa koncepteve t\u00eb lidhura me kund\u00ebrtransferenc\u00ebn dhe identifikimin projektues si jo vet\u00ebm mekaniz\u00ebm mbrojt\u00ebs dhe mjet komunikimi, por edhe si teknik\u00eb e metod\u00eb e nd\u00ebrhyrjes s\u00eb posa\u00e7me psikoanalitike. Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb vler\u00ebsuar po ashtu p\u00ebr disa shkrime e libra n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e krijimtatis\u00eb artistike n\u00eb form\u00ebn e romanit trillues. Kjo intervist\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb marr\u00eb nga libri i tij i fundit “Reclaiming Unlived Life”, ku p\u00ebrmblidhen disa nga eset\u00eb e tij nd\u00ebr vite. Luca Di Donna: Cilat qen\u00eb burimet e frym\u00ebzimit p\u00ebr ju n\u00eb pun\u00ebn tuaj t\u00eb hershme q\u00eb ju \u00e7uan t\u00eb p\u00ebrqafoni teorin\u00eb britanike t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve objektuale t\u00eb procesit t\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm? A ndodhi p\u00ebr shkak t\u00eb mospajtimeve me tradit\u00ebn amerikane t\u00eb psikologjis\u00eb s\u00eb egos apo qe vet\u00eb p\u00ebrvoja e pun\u00ebs suaj me pacient\u00eb q\u00eb ju \u00e7oi n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rrug\u00eb? Thomas H. Ogden: Luca, fillova t\u00eb interesohesha n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00eb p\u00ebrpara se t\u00eb kisha nj\u00eb em\u00ebr p\u00ebr t\u00eb. N\u00ebna ime ishte n\u00eb analiz\u00eb kur un\u00eb isha f\u00ebmij\u00eb i vog\u00ebl. Ajo \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb grua e ndjeshme dhe inteligjente, k\u00ebshtuq\u00eb nuk m\u00eb fliste rreth psikoanaliz\u00ebs, por ajo m\u00eb d\u00ebgjonte dhe m\u00eb fliste prej p\u00ebrvoj\u00ebs s\u00eb saj n\u00eb analiz\u00eb. P\u00ebrftova nj\u00ebfar\u00eb gjuhe p\u00ebr ndjeshm\u00ebrin\u00eb q\u00eb ajo sillte n\u00eb kujdesin m\u00ebm\u00ebsor vet\u00ebm kur isha 16 vje\u00e7, n\u00eb gjimnaz, kur m\u2019u dha nj\u00eb list\u00eb librash prej t\u00eb cil\u00ebve t\u00eb lexoja tre p\u00ebr leximet e ver\u00ebs. Prej librave sugjeruar, un\u00eb zgjodha Nj\u00eb hyrje e p\u00ebrgjithshme n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00eb t\u00eb Freud-it. M\u00eb kujtohet q\u00eb fillova ta lexoj n\u00eb autobus n\u00eb qytetin e New York-ut dhe se si u p\u00ebrfshiva aq shum\u00eb saq\u00eb humba stacionin, \u00e7ka nuk m\u00eb bezdisi fare meqen\u00ebse k\u00ebshtu do mund t\u00eb lexoja pa u shqet\u00ebsuar p\u00ebr aq koh\u00eb sa t\u00eb desha. M\u00eb shushati m\u00eb shum\u00eb z\u00ebri n\u00eb lib\u00ebr sesa idet\u00eb. Libri qe shkruar si nj\u00eb leksion imagjinar drejtuar d\u00ebgjuesve skeptik\u00eb. M\u00ebnyra se si Freud-i i flet audienc\u00ebs p\u00ebr dyshimet e tyre dhe frik\u00ebrat sa i p\u00ebrket asaj q\u00eb ai po thot\u00eb ishte shum\u00eb m\u00eb interesante p\u00ebr mua, at\u00ebher\u00eb dhe tani, se ideja \u2013 p\u00ebr shembull, psikologjia e pavet\u00ebdijshme e shakas\u00eb, qoft\u00eb edhe psikologjia e pavet\u00ebdijshme e \u00ebndrrave. A thua se e dija sakaq p\u00ebrmbajtjen e ideve \u2013 p\u00ebr mua ndihej sikur isha takuar me iden\u00eb e t\u00eb pavet\u00ebdijshmes q\u00eb prej koh\u00ebs kur m\u00ebsova t\u00eb flisja, ndofta edhe m\u00eb her\u00ebt. N\u00eb prapashikim, mendoj se kishte dy arsye p\u00ebrse z\u00ebri n\u00eb lib\u00ebr ishte gj\u00ebja q\u00eb m\u00eb interesonte m\u00eb shum\u00eb \u2013 me gjas\u00eb kishte shum\u00eb arsye, por do p\u00ebrmend vet\u00ebm dy. S\u00eb pari, z\u00ebri \u00ebsht\u00eb krijim letrar dhe un\u00eb e dashuroja shkrimin e Freud-it si shkrim. Dashuroja \u00e7far\u00ebdo shkrimtarie t\u00eb mir\u00eb nga e cila mendja ime 16-vje\u00e7are mund t\u00eb prekej.Arsyeja tjet\u00ebr p\u00ebrse e thitha z\u00ebrin n\u00eb lib\u00ebr me kaq zell dhe gatishm\u00ebri ishte, ma ha mendja, se ndihej sikur z\u00ebri q\u00eb po d\u00ebgjoja n\u00eb lib\u00ebr ishte z\u00ebri i analistit t\u00eb n\u00ebn\u00ebs time, nj\u00eb z\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin isha shum\u00eb kureshtar dhe, sigurisht, nuk e kisha d\u00ebgjuar kurr\u00eb drejt\u00ebp\u00ebrs\u00ebdrejti por sidoqoft\u00eb e kisha n\u00eb kock\u00eb. Pra, prezantimi im me psikoanaliz\u00ebn ndodhi p\u00ebrmes marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve objektuale \u2013 marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia ime e hershme me n\u00ebn\u00ebn time dhe, p\u00ebrmes saj, marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia ime e hershme me analistin e saj dhe me psikoanaliz\u00ebn. Kjo p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb e hershme me psikoanaliz\u00ebn ishte e nj\u00eb lloji t\u00eb pafjal\u00eb, lloj ky q\u00eb kishte t\u00eb b\u00ebnte me vet\u00eb qenien time dhe me vet\u00eb qenien e n\u00ebn\u00ebs time. Nuk i jam p\u00ebrgjigjur drejtp\u00ebrdrejt pyetjes, por kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00ebnyra m\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb q\u00eb mund t\u00eb filloj t\u00eb tregoj tregimin. Pasi \u201czbulova\u201d psikoanaliz\u00ebn, ose pasi m\u00eb zbuloi, kam lexuar disi kuturu libra q\u00eb hasja. Libri i dyt\u00eb psikoanalitik ishte Dashuria primare dhe teknika psikoanalitike e Balint-it, sepse qe i vetmi lib\u00ebr mbi psikoanaliz\u00ebn n\u00eb bibliotek\u00ebn e zon\u00ebs. Mund t\u00eb ndieja m\u00ebnyrat se si z\u00ebri dhe stili i shkrimit i k\u00ebtij libri dallonte shum\u00eb prej z\u00ebrit dhe stilit t\u00eb Freud-it. Balint-i po merrej me format e hershme t\u00eb dashuris\u00eb, nd\u00ebrsa Freud-i merakun e kishte me format e hershme t\u00eb seksualitetit. Edhe n\u00eb at\u00eb mosh\u00eb t\u00eb re, dashuria m\u00eb dukej ngjarje m\u00eb njer\u00ebzore sa diseksioni i seksualitetit ku qe futur Freud-i. Vendosa t\u00eb shkoj n\u00eb mjek\u00ebsi sepse, asokohe, vet\u00ebm doktor\u00ebt mjek\u00ebsor\u00eb pranoheshin n\u00eb institute psikoanalitike t\u00eb lidhura me Shoqat\u00ebn Amerikane Psikoanalitike e cila mbizot\u00ebronte n\u00eb psikoanaliz\u00ebn amerikane. Nuk e dija se kishte ca institute q\u00eb pranonin kandidat\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt nuk ishin mjek\u00eb. Nuk jam i sigurt q\u00eb nuk do ta merrja udh\u00ebn mjek\u00ebsore edhe n\u00ebse do kisha qen\u00eb i vet\u00ebdijsh\u00ebm q\u00eb do mund t\u00eb b\u00ebhesha psikoanalist pa t\u00eb. Mendoj se trajnimi mjek\u00ebsor ka vler\u00eb n\u00eb praktik\u00ebn e psikoanaliz\u00ebs. P\u00ebr mua, ajo q\u00eb kishte r\u00ebnd\u00ebsi n\u00eb trajnimin mjek\u00ebsor qe p\u00ebrvoja e marrjes p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr jet\u00ebn e pacientit n\u00eb kuptimin e fjal\u00ebp\u00ebrfjalsh\u00ebm. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi tejet e madhe dhe mendoj se disa analist\u00eb p\u00ebrpiqen ta mohojn\u00eb n\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnien e tyre me pacient\u00ebt e tyre. Shumic\u00ebn e koh\u00ebs, n\u00eb praktik\u00ebn psikoanalitike, pacient\u00ebt jan\u00eb plot\u00ebsisht t\u00eb aft\u00eb t\u00eb marrin p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr jet\u00ebt e tyre. Por kjo nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb k\u00ebshtu. P\u00ebr shembull, pacient\u00eb skizofren\u00eb dhe pacient\u00eb me tipe t\u00eb tjer\u00eb psikozash, si dhe pacient\u00eb t\u00eb depresuar dhe vet\u00ebvras\u00ebs, shpesh nuk jan\u00eb t\u00eb aft\u00eb t\u00eb marrin p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr jet\u00ebt e tyre. Shum\u00eb analist\u00eb dhe psikoterapist\u00eb, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt i kam trajtuar ose q\u00eb jan\u00eb k\u00ebshilluar me mua, kan\u00eb frik\u00eb prej k\u00ebsaj lloj p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsie dhe rreken ta shmangin duke mos marr\u00eb pacient\u00eb psikotik\u00eb apo vet\u00ebvras\u00ebs. Fatkeq\u00ebsisht, edhe p\u00ebr pacientin edhe p\u00ebr analistin, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithnj\u00eb e mundur t\u00eb parashikohet se cili pacient do t\u00eb b\u00ebhet psikotik apo vet\u00ebvras\u00ebs p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb terapis\u00eb ose analiz\u00ebs. N\u00eb fakt, un\u00eb besoj se \u00e7do p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb analitike q\u00eb ia vlen p\u00ebrfshin gjendje ndijimore psikotike dhe thell\u00ebsisht t\u00eb depresuara, dhe k\u00ebto gjendje shmangen nga analist\u00eb t\u00eb cil\u00ebt kan\u00eb frik\u00eb t\u00eb marrin p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsi p\u00ebr jet\u00ebt e pacient\u00ebve t\u00eb tyre. P\u00ebr ta sjell\u00eb s\u00ebrish bised\u00ebn te pyetja juaj rreth psikologjis\u00eb amerikane t\u00eb egos dhe teoris\u00eb britanike t\u00eb marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnieve objektuale, mendoj se analist\u00ebt e k\u00ebsaj t\u00eb dyt\u00ebs \u2013 p\u00ebr shembull<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8367,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","podmotor_file_id":"","podmotor_episode_id":"","cover_image":"","cover_image_id":"","duration":"","filesize":"","filesize_raw":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","ocean_post_layout":"right-sidebar","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"ocs-kulture-category-post-sidebar","ocean_second_sidebar":"0","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"0","ocean_custom_header_template":"0","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"default","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"0","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"off","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[5,4,829],"tags":[18,82,174,259,260,317],"class_list":["post-8362","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-kulture","category-kryenyje","category-perkthime","tag-analist","tag-endrra","tag-letersi","tag-psikanalize","tag-psikologji","tag-thomas-h-ogden","entry","has-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8362","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8362"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8362\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25596,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8362\/revisions\/25596"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8362"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8362"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8362"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}