{"id":29947,"date":"2026-03-24T09:49:20","date_gmt":"2026-03-24T08:49:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/?p=29947"},"modified":"2026-03-24T09:55:26","modified_gmt":"2026-03-24T08:55:26","slug":"tjetri-inkonsistent-i-jouissance-s-sllavoj-zhizhek-v","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/tjetri-inkonsistent-i-jouissance-s-sllavoj-zhizhek-v\/","title":{"rendered":"Tjetri inkonsistent i jouissance-s – Sllavoj Zhizhek (V)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\"\"\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
<\/figcaption>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figure>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Tjetri inkonsistent i jouissance-s<\/h2>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Sllavoj Zhizhek | P\u00ebrktheu Genc Shehu | nyje.al | 14.03.2026 \n<\/h1>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

K\u00ebshtu, kemi arritur sakaq te forma e kat\u00ebrt, e fundit dhe e plot\u00eb e grafikut t\u00eb d\u00ebshir\u00ebs, sepse ajo q\u00eb shtohet n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb form\u00eb t\u00eb fundit \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb vektor i ri i d\u00ebfrimit (<\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>) q\u00eb nd\u00ebrpritet me vektorin e d\u00ebshir\u00ebs s\u00eb strukturuar simbolikisht:<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Grafiku i Plot\u00ebsuar\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/p>

\"\"<\/p>

Grafiku i plot\u00eb ndahet pra n\u00eb dy nivele, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruhen si niveli i kuptimit dhe niveli i d\u00ebfrimit [<\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-s q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb si t\u00eb thuash <\/span>k\u00ebnaq\u00ebdhimbje<\/span><\/i>]. Problemi i nivelit t\u00eb par\u00eb (i poshtmi) \u00ebsht\u00eb se si kryq\u00ebzimi i zinxhirit t\u00eb shenjuesve dhe i nj\u00eb q\u00ebllim\u00ebsie mitike (<\/span>\u0394<\/b>) prodhon efektin e kuptimit, me t\u00eb gjith\u00eb artikulimin e tij t\u00eb brendsh\u00ebm: karakteri prapaveprues i kuptimit, p\u00ebr aq sa \u00ebsht\u00eb funksion i Tjetrit t\u00eb madh \u2013 p\u00ebr aq sa \u00ebsht\u00eb i kusht\u00ebzuar nga vendi i Tjetrit, bateria e shenjuesve (<\/span>s<\/i><\/b>(O)<\/b>); imagjinari (<\/span>i(o)<\/i><\/b>) dhe simboliku (<\/span>I(O)<\/b>) \u2013 identifikimi i subjektit bazuar n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb prodhim prapaveprues t\u00eb kuptimit dhe k\u00ebshtu me radh\u00eb. Problemi i nivelit t\u00eb dyt\u00eb (i sip\u00ebrmi) \u00ebsht\u00eb \u00e7far\u00eb ndodh kur vet\u00eb fusha e rendit t\u00eb shenjuesit, e Tjetrit t\u00eb madh, birohet, shpohet nga nj\u00eb rrym\u00eb para-simbolike (reale) <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i> \u2013 \u00e7far\u00eb ndodh kur \u201cl\u00ebnda\u201d para-simbolike, trupi si k\u00ebnaq\u00ebdhimbje e materializuar dhe e mish\u00ebruar, mplekset n\u00eb rrjetin e shenjuesve.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Rezultati i p\u00ebrgjithsh\u00ebm \u00ebsht\u00eb i qart\u00eb: duke u filtruar p\u00ebrmes sit\u00ebs s\u00eb shenjuesit, trupi i n\u00ebnshtrohet <\/span>kastrimit<\/span><\/i>, d\u00ebfrimi [<\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-a] evakuohet prej tij dhe trupi mbijeton i cop\u00ebtuar, i vdek\u00ebruar. Me fjal\u00eb t\u00eb tjera, rendi i shenjuesit (Tjetri i madh) dhe ai i d\u00ebfrimit (Gj\u00ebja si mish\u00ebrimi i saj) jan\u00eb rr\u00ebnj\u00ebsisht heterogjene, inkonsistente; \u00e7do p\u00ebrputhje midis tyre \u00ebsht\u00eb strukturalisht e pamundur. Kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb arsyeja pse, n\u00eb an\u00ebn e majt\u00eb t\u00eb nivelit t\u00eb sip\u00ebrm t\u00eb grafikut \u2013 n\u00eb pik\u00ebn e par\u00eb t\u00eb kryq\u00ebzimit mes d\u00ebfrimit dhe shenjuesit, <\/span>S(<\/b>\u2205<\/b>)<\/b> \u2013 gjejm\u00eb shenjuesin e munges\u00ebs n\u00eb Tjetrin, t\u00eb inkonsistenc\u00ebs s\u00eb Tjetrit: sapo fusha e shenjuesit penetrohet nga d\u00ebfrimi, ajo b\u00ebhet jo koherente, poroze, me bira \u2013 <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-a \u00ebsht\u00eb \u00e7ka nuk mund t\u00eb simbolizohet, prania e saj n\u00eb fush\u00ebn e shenjuesit mund t\u00eb zbulohet vet\u00ebm p\u00ebrmes vrimave dhe inkonsistencave t\u00eb k\u00ebsaj fushe, k\u00ebshtu q\u00eb i vetmi shenjues i mundsh\u00ebm i <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-s \u00ebsht\u00eb shenjuesi i munges\u00ebs n\u00eb Tjetrin, shenjuesi i inkonsistenc\u00ebs s\u00eb tij.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Sot, \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb fakt i r\u00ebndomt\u00eb q\u00eb subjekti i Lakanit \u00ebsht\u00eb i \u00e7ar\u00eb, i \u00ebsht\u00eb v\u00ebn\u00eb viza, i kryq\u00ebzuar, apo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb identik me nj\u00eb munges\u00eb n\u00eb zinxhirin shenj\u00ebzues. Megjithat\u00eb, p\u00ebrmasa m\u00eb radikale e teoris\u00eb s\u00eb Lakanit nuk q\u00ebndron n\u00eb njohjen e k\u00ebtij fakti, por n\u00eb t\u00eb kuptuarin se edhe Tjetri i madh, vet\u00eb rendi simbolik, \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithashtu i kryq\u00ebzuar, <\/span>barr\u00e9<\/span><\/i>, n\u00ebn barr\u00ebn e nj\u00eb pamund\u00ebsie themelore, i strukturuar rreth nj\u00eb b\u00ebrthame t\u00eb pamundur\/traumatike, rreth nj\u00eb mungese qendrore. Pa k\u00ebt\u00eb munges\u00eb n\u00eb Tjetrin, Tjetri do t\u00eb ishte nj\u00eb struktur\u00eb e mbyllur dhe e vetmja mund\u00ebsi e hapur p\u00ebr subjektin do t\u00eb ishte tjet\u00ebrsimi i tij ose t\u00ebhuaj\u00ebsimi radikal n\u00eb Tjetrin. Pra, \u00ebsht\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht kjo munges\u00eb n\u00eb Tjetrin q\u00eb i mund\u00ebson subjektit t\u00eb arrij\u00eb nj\u00eb lloj \u201c\u00e7-t\u00ebhuaj\u00ebsimi\u201d, i quajtur nga Lakani <\/span>ndarje<\/span><\/i> [<\/span>separation<\/span><\/i>]: jo n\u00eb kuptimin q\u00eb tani subjekti p\u00ebrjeton ndarjen p\u00ebrgjithmon\u00eb nga objekti prej penges\u00ebs s\u00eb gjuh\u00ebs, por q\u00eb <\/span>objekti \u00ebsht\u00eb ndar\u00eb nga vet\u00eb Tjetri<\/span><\/i>, q\u00eb vet\u00eb Tjetri \u201cnuk e ka at\u00eb\u201d, nuk e ka p\u00ebrgjigjen p\u00ebrfundimtare \u2013 dometh\u00ebn\u00eb, \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb vetvete i bllokuar, d\u00ebshirues; q\u00eb ka edhe nj\u00eb d\u00ebshir\u00eb t\u00eb Tjetrit. Kjo munges\u00eb n\u00eb Tjetrin i jep subjektit \u2013 t\u00eb themi \u2013 nj\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb frym\u00eb, duke e lejuar at\u00eb t\u00eb shmang\u00eb tjet\u00ebrsimin total te shenjuesi, e jo duke e mbushur munges\u00ebn e tij, por duke lejuar q\u00eb t\u00eb identifikoj\u00eb veten, munges\u00ebn e tij, me munges\u00ebn n\u00eb Tjetrin.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Tre nivelet e vektorit zbrit\u00ebs n\u00eb an\u00ebn e majt\u00eb t\u00eb grafikut mund t\u00eb lexohen duke marr\u00eb parasysh logjik\u00ebn q\u00eb rregullon rendin e tyre. S\u00eb pari, kemi <\/span>S(<\/b>\u2205<\/b>)<\/b>: shenja e munges\u00ebs s\u00eb Tjetrit, e inkonsistenc\u00ebs s\u00eb rendit simbolik kur ky dep\u00ebrtohet nga <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>; pastaj <\/span>S\u25cao<\/b>, formula e fantazis\u00eb: funksioni i fantazis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb sh\u00ebrbej\u00eb si ekran-vello q\u00eb fsheh k\u00ebt\u00eb inkonsistenc\u00eb; dhe s\u00eb fundi <\/span>s(O)<\/b>, efekti i dometh\u00ebnies si\u00e7 dominohet nga fantazia: fantazia funksionon si \u201cdometh\u00ebnie absolute\u201d (Lakan); ajo p\u00ebrb\u00ebn korniz\u00ebn p\u00ebrmes s\u00eb cil\u00ebs ne p\u00ebrjetojm\u00eb bot\u00ebn si konsistente dhe me kuptim \u2013 hap\u00ebsira <\/span>a priori<\/span><\/i> brenda s\u00eb cil\u00ebs ndodhin efektet e ve\u00e7anta t\u00eb dometh\u00ebnies.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Pika e fundit q\u00eb duhet sqaruar \u00ebsht\u00eb pse gjejm\u00eb n\u00eb pik\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr, n\u00eb an\u00ebn e djatht\u00eb t\u00eb pik\u00ebprerjes mes <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-s dhe shenjuesit formul\u00ebn e shtys\u00ebs <\/span>($\u25caD)<\/b>? E kemi th\u00ebn\u00eb tashm\u00eb se shenjuesi e cop\u00ebton trupin, se ai e evakuon d\u00ebfrimin nga trupi, por ky \u201cevakuim\u201d (Jacques-Alain Miller) nuk kryhet kurr\u00eb plot\u00ebsisht; gjithmon\u00eb ka disa mbetje, oaze t\u00eb d\u00ebfrimit, t\u00eb ashtuquajturat \u201czona erogjene\u201d, fragmente ende t\u00eb dep\u00ebrtuara me <\/span>jouissance <\/span><\/i>t\u00eb hap\u00ebrdara n\u00ebp\u00ebr shkret\u00ebtir\u00ebn e Tjetrit simbolik \u2013 dhe jan\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht k\u00ebto mbetje me t\u00eb cilat \u00ebsht\u00eb lidhur shtysa frojdiane: ajo qarkullon, pulson rreth tyre. K\u00ebto zona erogjene jan\u00eb t\u00eb sh\u00ebnuara me <\/span>D<\/b> (<\/span>demande<\/span><\/i>, k\u00ebrkesa simbolike) sepse nuk ka asgj\u00eb \u201cnatyrale\u201d, \u201cbiologjike\u201d n\u00eb to: cila pjes\u00eb e trupit do t\u2019i mbijetoj\u00eb \u201cevakuimit t\u00eb d\u00ebfrimit\u201d, kjo nuk p\u00ebrcaktohet nga fiziologjia por nga m\u00ebnyra se si trupi zgavrohet p\u00ebrmes shenjuesit (si\u00e7 konfirmohet nga ato simptoma histerike ku pjes\u00ebt e trupit nga t\u00eb cilat <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-a evakuohet \u201cnormalisht\u201d b\u00ebhen s\u00ebrish t\u00eb erotizuara \u2013 qafa, hunda…).<\/span><\/span><\/p>

Ndoshta duhet t\u00eb rrezikojm\u00eb dhe ta lexojm\u00eb <\/span>$\u25caD<\/b> n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb retroaktive, nga zhvillimi i m\u00ebvonsh\u00ebm teorik i Lakanit, si formul\u00ebn e <\/span>sinthome<\/span><\/i>-s: nj\u00eb formacion specifik shenj\u00ebzues i cili \u00ebsht\u00eb i dep\u00ebrtuar menj\u00ebher\u00eb nga <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-a \u2013 dometh\u00ebn\u00eb, pik\u00ebbashkimi i pamundur i <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-s me shenjuesin. Nj\u00eb lexim i till\u00eb na jep nj\u00eb \u00e7el\u00ebs p\u00ebr nivelin e sip\u00ebrm, p\u00ebr katrorin e sip\u00ebrm t\u00eb grafikut t\u00eb d\u00ebshir\u00ebs n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me katrorin e posht\u00ebm: n\u00eb vend t\u00eb identifikimit imagjinar (marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnia mes egos imagjinare dhe imazhit t\u00eb saj themelues, egoja e saj ideale), kemi k\u00ebtu d\u00ebshir\u00ebn (<\/span>d<\/i><\/b>) t\u00eb mb\u00ebshtetur nga fantazia (<\/span>$\u25caa<\/b>); funksioni i fantazis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb t\u00eb mbush\u00eb hendekun q\u00eb \u00e7elet te Tjetri, t\u00eb fsheh\u00eb inkonsistenc\u00ebn e tij \u2013 si p\u00ebr shembull, prania magjeps\u00ebse e ndonj\u00eb skenari seksual q\u00eb sh\u00ebrben si ekran p\u00ebr t\u00eb maskuar pamund\u00ebsin\u00eb e marr\u00ebdh\u00ebnies seksuale. Fantazia fsheh faktin se Tjetri, rendi simbolik, \u00ebsht\u00eb i strukturuar rreth nj\u00eb pamund\u00ebsie traumatike, rreth di\u00e7kaje q\u00eb nuk mund t\u00eb simbolizohet \u2013 pra, rreth reales s\u00eb<\/span> jouissance<\/span><\/i>-s: p\u00ebrmes fantazis\u00eb, <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-a domestikohet, zbutet, \u201cgjentrifikohet\u201d \u2013 at\u00ebher\u00eb, \u00e7far\u00eb ndodh me d\u00ebshir\u00ebn pasi ne \u201cp\u00ebrshkojm\u00eb fantazin\u00eb\u201d? P\u00ebrgjigjja e Lakanit, n\u00eb faqet e fundit t\u00eb <\/span>Seminarit XI<\/span><\/i>, \u00ebsht\u00eb <\/span>shtysa<\/span><\/i>, tek e fundit <\/span>shtysa e vdekjes<\/span><\/i>: \u201cp\u00ebrtej fantazis\u00eb\u201d nuk ka asnj\u00eb \u00ebndje apo ndonj\u00eb dukuri t\u00eb sojit sublim, \u201cp\u00ebrtej fantazis\u00eb\u201d gjejm\u00eb vet\u00ebm shtys\u00ebn, pulsimin e saj rreth <\/span>sinthome<\/span><\/i>-s. \u201cKalimi p\u00ebrmes fantazis\u00eb\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb pra korrelativi i rrept\u00eb i identifikimit me nj\u00eb <\/span>sinthome<\/span><\/i>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u201cKalim p\u00ebrmes\u201d fantazis\u00eb sociale<\/i><\/b><\/span><\/p>

K\u00ebshtu, mund ta lexojm\u00eb t\u00eb gjith\u00eb nivelin e sip\u00ebrm (t\u00eb dyt\u00eb) t\u00eb grafikut si p\u00ebrshkrues i p\u00ebrmas\u00ebs \u201cp\u00ebrtej interpelimit\u201d: pamund\u00ebsia e gjetjes s\u00eb \u201ckatrorit t\u00eb rrethit\u201d p\u00ebr identifikimin simbolik dhe\/ose imagjinar nuk rezulton kurr\u00eb pa mbetje, gjithmon\u00eb mbetet nj\u00eb tepric\u00eb q\u00eb \u00e7el hap\u00ebsir\u00eb p\u00ebr d\u00ebshir\u00eb dhe e b\u00ebn Tjetrin (rendin simbolik) inkonsistent, si dhe me fantazin\u00eb si p\u00ebrpjekje p\u00ebr t\u00eb kap\u00ebrcyer, p\u00ebr t\u00eb fshehur k\u00ebt\u00eb inkonsistenc\u00eb, k\u00ebt\u00eb hendek brenda Tjetrit. Dhe tani m\u00eb n\u00eb fund mund t\u00eb kthehemi te problematika e ideologjis\u00eb: dob\u00ebsia kryesore e eseve t\u00eb deritanishme \u201c(post-)strukturaliste\u201d mbi teorin\u00eb e ideologjis\u00eb q\u00eb rrjedhin nga teoria althuseriane e interpelimit \u00ebsht\u00eb se e kufizojn\u00eb veten vet\u00ebm n\u00eb nivelin e posht\u00ebm, te katrori i posht\u00ebm i grafikut t\u00eb d\u00ebshir\u00ebs s\u00eb Lakanit \u2014 q\u00eb synojn\u00eb t\u00eb rrokin efikasitetin e nj\u00eb ideologjie ekskluzivisht p\u00ebrmes mekanizmave t\u00eb identifikimit imagjinar dhe simbolik. P\u00ebrmasa \u201cp\u00ebrtej interpelimit\u201d, e cila u la jasht\u00eb, nuk ka t\u00eb b\u00ebj\u00eb fare me ndonj\u00eb davaritje apo pluralitet t\u00eb pashmangsh\u00ebm t\u00eb procesit shenj\u00ebzues \u2013 me faktin se rr\u00ebshqitja metonimike gjithmon\u00eb subverton \u00e7do ngulitje t\u00eb kuptimit, \u00e7do \u201ckopsitje\u201d t\u00eb shenjuesve pluskues (si\u00e7 do t\u00eb shfaqej n\u00eb nj\u00eb perspektiv\u00eb \u201cpost-strukturaliste\u201d). \u201cP\u00ebrtej interpelimit\u201d \u00ebsht\u00eb katrori i d\u00ebshir\u00ebs, fantazis\u00eb, munges\u00ebs te Tjetri dhe shtys\u00ebs q\u00eb pulson rreth nj\u00eb teprice t\u00eb pap\u00ebrballueshme t\u00eb <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-s.<\/span><\/span><\/p>

\u00c7far\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb kjo p\u00ebr teorin\u00eb e ideologjis\u00eb? N\u00eb pamje t\u00eb par\u00eb, mund t\u00eb duket se ajo q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb e r\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme n\u00eb analiz\u00ebn e ideologjis\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm m\u00ebnyra se si ajo funksionon si ligj\u00ebrim, se si seria e shenjuesve pluskues totalizohet dhe transformohet n\u00eb nj\u00eb fush\u00eb t\u00eb bashkuar p\u00ebrmes nd\u00ebrhyrjes s\u00eb disa \u201cnyjeve\u201d. Shkurt: m\u00ebnyra se si mekanizmat ligj\u00ebrimor\u00eb formojn\u00eb fush\u00ebn e kuptimit ideologjik; n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb perspektiv\u00eb, d\u00ebfrimi-n\u00eb-shenjues do t\u00eb ishte thjesht para-ideologjik, i par\u00ebnd\u00ebsish\u00ebm p\u00ebr ideologjin\u00eb si nj\u00eb lidhje sociale. Mir\u00ebpo, rasti i t\u00eb ashtuquajturit \u201ctotalitariz\u00ebm\u201d demonstron at\u00eb q\u00eb vlen p\u00ebr \u00e7do ideologji, p\u00ebr ideologjin\u00eb si t\u00eb till\u00eb: mb\u00ebshtetja apo streha e fundit e efektit ideologjik (e m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs si nj\u00eb rrjet ideologjik shenjuesish na \u201cmban [t\u00eb kapur]\u201d) \u00ebsht\u00eb b\u00ebrthama e pakuptimt\u00eb, para-ideologjike e <\/span>jouissance<\/span><\/i>-s. N\u00eb ideologji, \u201cjo gjith\u00e7ka \u00ebsht\u00eb ideologji (dometh\u00ebn\u00eb, jo gjith\u00e7ka ka kuptim ideologjik)\u201d, por pik\u00ebrisht kjo tepric\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb streha e fundit e ideologjis\u00eb. Prandaj, mund t\u00eb themi se ekzistojn\u00eb gjithashtu dy procedura komplementare t\u00eb \u201ckritik\u00ebs s\u00eb ideologjis\u00eb\u201d:<\/span><\/span><\/p>