{"id":1457,"date":"2018-07-25T13:07:47","date_gmt":"2018-07-25T11:07:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nyje.al\/?p=1457"},"modified":"2024-08-26T16:13:42","modified_gmt":"2024-08-26T14:13:42","slug":"slavoj-zizek-mbi-patologjite-e-politikes-bashkekohore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/slavoj-zizek-mbi-patologjite-e-politikes-bashkekohore\/","title":{"rendered":"Slavoj \u017di\u017eek mbi patologjit\u00eb e politik\u00ebs bashk\u00ebkohore"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

25.07.2018 | nyje.al<\/strong><\/span><\/p>

\u00a0<\/p>

\"\"<\/span><\/p>

Kund\u00ebr shantazhit t\u00eb dyfisht\u00eb: bised\u00eb me redaktuesit shkencor\u00eb Genci Shehu dhe Pavjo Gjini<\/b><\/strong><\/span><\/p>

N\u00eb daljen e tij t\u00eb fundit n\u00eb Madrid, n\u00eb maj t\u00eb vitit 2018-s, filozofi slloven Sllavoj Zhizhek u vler\u00ebsua me \u00e7mimin e Rrethit t\u00eb Arteve t\u00eb Bukura. N\u00eb momentin q\u00eb ky filozof merr \u00e7mimin, thot\u00eb q\u00eb nuk i p\u00eblqejn\u00eb k\u00ebto gj\u00ebra, por ama ua pranoj dhe ndihem i nderuar q\u00eb po ma jepni. \u00c7mimi kishte motivimin e nj\u00eb figure\u00a0si Zhizheku i cili ndikon n\u00eb p\u00ebrhapjen mendimit\u00a0kritik te t\u00eb rinjt\u00eb. U shpreh se akte t\u00eb tilla provokuese na duhen sidomos n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb koh\u00eb kur e djathta dhe e gjith\u00eb fryma e Trumpit ka krijuar te njer\u00ebzit iden\u00eb se t\u00eb jesh i sjellsh\u00ebm \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7ka tashm\u00eb e tejkaluar dhe e dal\u00eb mode. S\u00eb dyti n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn dalje publike thekson q\u00eb ndjehet nj\u00eb lloj presioni n\u00eb mjediset universitare, akademike p\u00ebr t\u2019i b\u00ebr\u00eb ato t\u00eb dobishme, praktike, p\u00ebrndryshe impakti i tyre konsiderohet i pavlefsh\u00ebm.<\/span><\/p>

A ka sh\u00ebrbyer ky moment p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrkufizuar pozit\u00ebn e k\u00ebtij njeriu n\u00eb raport me t\u00eb djatht\u00ebn dhe sjelleve publike?<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Genci Shehu:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0S\u00eb pari me pjes\u00ebn e figur\u00ebs s\u00eb personit q\u00eb mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb rr\u00ebmbyer apo futur n\u00eb v\u00ebrshimin e frym\u00ebs s\u00eb Trumpit dhe t\u00eb djatht\u00ebs alternative q\u00eb ka lindur nga 2017 e k\u00ebndej, do thoja q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb jemi m\u00eb t\u00eb sjellsh\u00ebm me ta. Gabimi tipik q\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb t\u00eb majt\u00ebt liberal, e th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00ebllimisht t\u00eb majt\u00ebt liberal pasi priren nga t\u00eb q\u00ebnurit korrekt politikisht, \u00ebsht\u00eb sharja, p\u00ebrbuzja apo tallja q\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb ndaj t\u00eb djatht\u00ebve. Mb\u00ebshtet\u00ebsit e Trumpit m\u00eb shum\u00eb hidh\u00ebrohen dhe nguliten m\u00eb thell\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb pozicion q\u00eb sakaq jan\u00eb, sesa kan\u00eb mund\u00ebsi dialogu. N\u00eb nj\u00eb moment ku tjetri (i djatht\u00eb) mund t\u00eb haset me nj\u00eb logjik\u00eb tjet\u00ebr dhe t\u00eb ndeshet me fakte,\u00a0\u00ebsht\u00eb hapi i par\u00eb ku mund t\u00eb hyjm\u00eb n\u00eb dialog. N\u00ebse nuk jemi t\u00eb sjellsh\u00ebm nuk mundemi ta b\u00ebjm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb, nuk mjafton q\u00eb t\u00eb themi q\u00eb kjo rrym\u00eb e re e djatht\u00eb eshte treguese q\u00eb situata jon\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsuar shum\u00eb dhe ta mbyllim me aq. Madje na vlen q\u00eb ta themi m\u00eb shum\u00eb q\u00eb ky zhvillim i ri \u00ebsht\u00eb shenj\u00eb shprese p\u00ebr ne.\u00a0P\u00ebr ta th\u00ebn\u00eb paraprakisht, para se t\u00eb kalojm\u00eb me lokalizimin e kuptimit t\u00eb shantazhit t\u00eb dyfisht\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb se ndoshta sot nuk po funksionon shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb n\u00eb Europ\u00eb dhe kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb shenj\u00eb e mir\u00eb. Shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb forma sesi t\u00eb mban t\u00eb kapur n\u00eb sistem vet\u00eb sistemi. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast BE me arkitektonik\u00ebn e saj t\u00eb keqbazuar. Vet\u00eb fakti q\u00eb ka shenja d\u00ebshtimi t\u00eb shantazhit t\u00eb dyfisht\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb shenj\u00eb e mir\u00eb, pasi ka refuzim t\u00eb pranimit t\u00eb ligj\u00ebrimit t\u00eb establishmentit.<\/span><\/p>

Hyrja e k\u00ebtij diskutimi ishte e till\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb zbuluar figur\u00ebn e k\u00ebtij filozofi duke ju referuar t\u00eb djatht\u00ebs, n\u00eb pozit\u00ebn e nj\u00eb t\u00eb majti kundrejt kapitalizmit dhe kusht\u00ebzimit t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb jetuarit q\u00eb i ka b\u00ebr\u00eb njer\u00ebzve n\u00eb epok\u00ebn ton\u00eb. Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb pozita e Zhizhekut p\u00ebrball\u00eb k\u00ebtyre fenomen<\/i><\/em>e<\/i><\/em>ve dhe p\u00ebrse q\u00ebndrimet e tij jan\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebshirueshme, p\u00ebrse thirret gjithmon\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb lexuar situata t\u00eb tilla?\u00a0<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Pavjo Gjini<\/b><\/strong>: P\u00ebr tradit\u00ebn e filozofis\u00eb s\u00eb 40 viteve t\u00eb fundit, thirrja p\u00ebr ta interpretuar bot\u00ebn ka qen\u00eb thirrja kryesore dhe Zhizheku \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb rradh\u00ebn e atyre filozof\u00ebve q\u00eb insistojn\u00eb n\u00eb kthyerjen kok\u00ebposht\u00eb t\u00eb tezes s\u00eb Feuerbach t\u00eb Marxit; Marksi thot\u00eb q\u00eb filozof\u00ebt deri tani kan\u00eb tentuar p\u00ebr ta interpretuar bot\u00ebn, dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb ta ndryshojm\u00eb. Nd\u00ebrsa Zhizhek insiston tek e kund\u00ebrta, thot\u00eb ndoshta kemi tentuar shum\u00eb koh\u00ebt e fundit p\u00ebr ta ndryshuar bot\u00ebn, ndaj tani ka ardhur koha p\u00ebr ta interpretuar at\u00eb. K\u00ebshtuq\u00eb un\u00eb mund t\u00eb flas si lexues. \u00cbsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shprehje q\u00eb Zhizhek e p\u00ebrmend shpesh:\u00a0ai thot\u00eb q\u00eb un\u00eb shkruaj p\u00ebr ata q\u00eb n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn e p\u00ebrditshme i quajm\u00eb si t\u00eb vonuar, ata q\u00eb s\u2019arrijn\u00eb me kuptu situat\u00ebn, q\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb nuk din\u00eb sesi ti raportohen bot\u00ebs, tjetrit, disi figura e teveqelit. Zhizhek shkruan p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb modalitet personi dhe un\u00eb vet\u00eb e kam nis\u00eb dhe jam ky\u00e7ur n\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebr faktin se ma b\u00ebn bot\u00ebn t\u00eb interpretueshme. Ndaj ai lexohet m\u00eb shum\u00eb p\u00ebr interpretimin e bot\u00ebs sesa p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb prej tij maksima dhe t\u00eb vazhdosh pastaj me nj\u00eb aksion politik imediat pasi ke mbaruar librin. Edhe pasi ke mbaruar librin nuk do t\u00eb dish se \u00e7far\u00eb duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebsh me jet\u00ebn t\u00ebnde\u2026jo! Thjesht je pak m\u00eb i qart\u00eb te ky konstelacioni i forcave gjeo-politike bot\u00ebrore edhe sesi jan\u00eb t\u00eb implikume n\u00eb kriz\u00ebn e refugjat\u00ebve, di\u00e7ka e cila nuk vihet n\u00eb pah nga ata q\u00eb thon\u00eb direkt mbaj an\u00eb.\u00a0Kemi ca protofashist\u00eb ksenofob anti-emigrant, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt t\u00eb thon\u00eb q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb rrish me establishmentin se p\u00ebrndryshe ja ku i ke k\u00ebta k\u00ebrc\u00ebnuesit jasht\u00eb; t\u00eb thon\u00eb po ashtu angazhohu pasi nuk ka koh\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb mendu, dhe sidomos n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb niveli i diskursit t\u00eb s\u00eb majt\u00ebs liberale n\u00eb Europ\u00eb. \u201cA, po boll kemi ba teori vet\u00ebm vepro direkt\u2026ska nevoj\u00eb me mendu, vet\u00ebm \u00e7a t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb tani dhe t\u00eb vazhdojm\u00eb k\u00ebshtu symbyllurazi p\u00ebrpara\u201d dhe Zhizheku i reziston vazhdimisht k\u00ebsaj, thot\u00eb jo: ndoshta kemi vepru tep\u00ebr, ndalo; mendo. Dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb sens \u00ebsht\u00eb disi kund\u00ebrveprues n\u00eb raport me gjith\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb maksim\u00ebn e veprimit, angazhimit, aktivizmit, por sigurisht pa hequr dor\u00eb nga perspektiva e majt\u00eb emancipuese. U b\u00ebn\u00eb dy vite, q\u00eb kur ka ardh\u00eb Trumpi n\u00eb pushtet q\u00eb duhet t\u2019i rikthehemi nj\u00eb mir\u00ebsjellje klasike ndaj tjetrit dhe ndaj hap\u00ebsir\u00ebs publike sepse niveli i diskursit n\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00ebn publike ka degradu shum\u00eb. Rasti i ardhjes s\u00eb Ram\u00ebs n\u00eb pushtet: ai erdhi jo duke th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00eb jam Kryeministri q\u00eb e di rrug\u00ebn\u00a0dhe\u00a0e di se nga duhet t\u00eb shkojm\u00eb. Jo. Ai vjen n\u00eb pushtet duke th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00eb jam si gjith\u00eb ju t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt, jam po aq i ul\u00ebt dhe po aq i ndyr\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>

P\u00ebrse na ndihmon ky krahasim?<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Pavjo Gjini:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0P\u00ebr ta shpjeguar m\u00eb duhet t\u00eb rimarr nj\u00eb diskutim t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb para disa jav\u00ebsh te Qendra Ata me t\u00eb ftuar Ardian Vehbiun. Edhe pse ndoshta nuk e ka pasur n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kontekst, mendoj se kemi nj\u00eb problem tjet\u00ebr nga ajo q\u00eb konstaton Vehbiu n\u00eb lidhje me personin dhe sjelljen e tij n\u00eb publik. Modeli i njeriut i cili n\u00eb publik e ndjen domosdoshm\u00ebrin\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019u sjell\u00eb n\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb dinjitoze, akademike nd\u00ebrsa privatisht \u00ebsht\u00eb po aq i frustruar, seksualisht i pervertum sa t\u00eb gjith\u00eb njer\u00ebzit e tjer\u00eb ka qen\u00eb ndoshta problem n\u00eb per\u00ebndimin liberal para \u201968-s. Problemi yn\u00eb sot \u00ebsht\u00eb akoma m\u00eb i r\u00ebnd\u00eb. Sot kemi nj\u00eb person q\u00eb del n\u00eb publik dhe sillet po aq ndyr\u00eb, ul\u00ebt e pis\u00ebt sa n\u00eb jet\u00ebn e tij private. Madje, rrezik po t\u00eb flas\u00ebsh me t\u00eb pas kuintave do t\u00eb t\u00eb thot\u00eb \u201cjo more, un\u00eb jam njeri normal si gjith\u00eb t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt, por n\u00eb publik duhet t\u00eb sillem k\u00ebshtu se nuk kam si t\u2019ia b\u00ebj ndryshe\u201d. Ndaj dhe Zhizhek insiston q\u00eb duhet t\u2019i rikthehemi sjelljeve diskrete, t\u00eb mira,\u00a0n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet t\u00eb cilave t\u00eb respektojm\u00eb tjetrin.<\/span><\/p>

Zhizhek mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb ndoshta eksporti m\u00eb i madh i mendimit filozofik bot\u00ebror q\u00eb ka b\u00ebr\u00eb Europa Lindore- Q\u00ebndrore nga nj\u00eb vend i cili ka vuajtur praktik\u00ebn e gabuar t\u00eb marksizmit. Cfar\u00eb mund t\u00eb na thoni p\u00ebr rrethanat ku \u00ebsht\u00eb formuar ky filozof dhe momentin e \u201ceksportimit\u201d t\u00eb mendimit t\u00eb tij n\u00eb per\u00ebndim?<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Genci Shehu:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0Interesante q\u00eb e gjeni fjal\u00ebn ekonomike t\u00eb eksport-importit p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb rast. Doja t\u00eb shtoja p\u00ebrpara se t\u00eb futemi te kjo pyetje, thjesht p\u00ebr t\u00eb identifikuar politikisht se ku q\u00ebndron Zhizheku. L\u00ebvizje anti-kapitaliste ka patur q\u00eb n\u00eb vitet \u201990 dhe jan\u00eb zhvilluar akoma m\u00eb shum\u00eb pas 2008-s dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb sens mund t\u00eb themi q\u00eb ka nj\u00eb pozicion anti-kapitalist i cili nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb domosdo komunist edhe pse s\u2019ka tamam-tamam pozicion komunist q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb pro kapitalist. Zhizheku nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht anti-kapitalist. Ai ishte me Trumpin dy dit\u00eb para se t\u00eb zgjidhej, sepse kjo figur\u00eb n\u00eb fakt do e shk\u00ebrmoqte pozicionin ideologjik. Ai \u00ebsht\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonisht skeptik ndaj l\u00ebvizjeve q\u00eb jan\u00eb vet\u00ebm anti-.\u00a0Vet\u00ebm kund\u00ebrshtimi i nj\u00eb dicka-je t\u00eb \u00e7on n\u00eb p\u00ebrcarje. Njer\u00ebzit bashkohen shum\u00eb m\u00eb leht\u00eb kur jan\u00eb kund\u00ebr shembjes s\u00eb teatrit por jo krejt\u00ebsisht t\u00eb bashkuar kur u duhet t\u00eb vendosin se \u00e7far\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb me t\u00eb, a t\u00eb restaurohet apo t\u00eb kthehet n\u00eb muze, q\u00eb mua m\u00eb duket m\u00eb e tmerrshme kjo sesa t\u00eb shembet. Dhe kur \u00ebsht\u00eb pozitivisht p\u00ebr di\u00e7ka ai thot\u00eb q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb komunist, dhe aty b\u00ebn s\u00ebrisht nj\u00eb moment zmbrapsjeje kur thot\u00eb q\u00eb komunizmin nuk e konsideroj pozitivisht si zgjidhjen e problemeve, por si problem i t\u00eb p\u00ebrbashk\u00ebtave.\u00a0Kjo duhej th\u00ebn\u00eb sepse \u00ebsht\u00eb pozicioni formal i Zhizhekut. Ai v\u00ebrtet vjen nga Sllovenia, por ky shtet ishte pjes\u00eb e Jugosllavis\u00eb, e cila nuk ishte varianti m\u00eb i eg\u00ebr i interpretimit marksist apo interpretimit t\u00eb gabuar marksist si\u00e7 e that\u00eb. Un\u00eb nuk jam i mendimit q\u00eb interpretimi i gabuar i marksizmit dhe tragjedia q\u00eb pasoi si rrjedhoj\u00eb e saj, ishin pjes\u00eb p\u00ebrb\u00ebr\u00ebse e ides\u00eb s\u00eb marksizmit dhe komunizmit. Dhe p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb arsye Zhizhek insiston q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb p\u00ebrfaq\u00ebsuese e dialektik\u00ebs s\u00eb p\u00ebrndritjes s\u00eb modernizimit rasti komunisto-socialist sesa rasti nacional-komunist. Dometh\u00ebn\u00eb stalinizmi, shum\u00eb m\u00eb tep\u00ebr sesa nazizmi. Forma jugosllave ishte forma m\u00eb e kompromentuar e asaj ideje. Jugosllavia luante t\u00eb dyja kampet, jepte nj\u00eb mund\u00ebsi relativisht m\u00eb liberale t\u00eb mendimit, ve\u00e7an\u00ebrisht n\u00eb Slloveni krahasimisht me Kosov\u00ebn t\u00eb cil\u00ebs nuk ia lejonin as tekstet e fizik\u00ebs. Ky si kusht dhe fakti q\u00eb Zhizhek insiston q\u00eb realizimi i marksizmit n\u00eb shek. e XX- t\u00eb, nuk ka qen\u00eb thjesht lexim i gabuar i Marksizmit. Ka patur di\u00e7ka autentike, t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb t\u00eb marksizmit q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb kaq tragjike dhe q\u00eb prapseprap\u00eb aty q\u00ebndron shtegdalja prej situat\u00ebs ku ndodhemi ne sot.<\/span><\/p>

Pavjo Gjini<\/b><\/strong>: Zhizhek del n\u00eb pah si autor m\u00eb shum\u00eb se t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt p\u00ebr shkak se gjith\u00eb autor\u00ebt e tjer\u00eb t\u00eb m\u00ebdhenj n\u00eb per\u00ebndim nuk kryejn\u00eb shum\u00eb pun\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb ndaluar situat\u00ebn aktuale. Qoft\u00eb Habermasi i cili mbetet vet\u00ebm te klisheja liberale, qoft\u00eb Judith Butler me gjith\u00eb loj\u00ebn diskursive q\u00eb fillon e b\u00ebhet gjithmon\u00eb m\u00eb e pamundur p\u00ebr t\u00eb pohuar dicka, qoft\u00eb Antonio Negri pas d\u00ebshtimit t\u00eb protestave kundra G8, \u00eborld Social Forum,\u00a0k\u00ebto tentative t\u00eb majta post-marksiste, anti-kapitaliste, d\u00ebshtojn\u00eb edhe k\u00ebto. Apo dhe figura t\u00eb tjera q\u00eb jan\u00eb m\u00eb n\u00eb sfond si Giorgio Agamben, por jan\u00eb shum\u00eb akademik. Zhizheku jep nj\u00eb shembull fantastik, ai na thot\u00eb t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb nj\u00eb eksperiment: merrni nj\u00eb autor si Habermasi dhe lexoni t\u00eb gjith\u00eb sa ka shkruar n\u00eb Gjermanin\u00eb per\u00ebndimore, gjat\u00eb koh\u00ebs kur ajo ka q\u00ebn\u00eb e ndar\u00eb dhe nqs lexoni vet\u00ebm vepr\u00ebn e tij dhe asgj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr, ju nuk do ta dini kurr\u00eb q\u00eb ky shtet ka qen\u00eb i ndar\u00eb, pasi autorit as nuk i p\u00ebrb\u00ebn fare objekt mendimi socialist. Kur vjen dikush pas r\u00ebnies s\u00eb murit t\u00eb Berlinit, si puna e Zhizhekut dhe grupit t\u00eb tij, pjesa tjet\u00ebr ia p\u00ebrmohojn\u00eb pjes\u00ebn monstruoze e t\u00eb p\u00ebrbindshme, tragjike duke e trajtuar si liberal. Si nj\u00eb tjet\u00ebr rast t\u00eb vullnetit p\u00ebr pushtet, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb nuk ishte nj\u00eb i till\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>

P\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhur pastaj te stili i Zhizhekut p\u00ebr t\u00eb cilin mund t\u00eb flasim pafund\u00ebsisht. Po e mendoja vazhdimisht k\u00ebto dit\u00eb dhe po ia shtroja pyetjen vetes se p\u00ebrse jam fiksuar me k\u00ebt\u00eb autor, ka 5 vjet q\u00eb shoh n\u00eb youtube a ka dal\u00eb kund, cili ka qen\u00eb q\u00ebndrimi i mbajtur nga ai p\u00ebr \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb ndryshme. N\u00eb nj\u00eb far\u00eb m\u00ebnyre e trajtoj si Mjesht\u00ebr, tutem me mendu di\u00e7ka apo me th\u00ebn\u00eb di\u00e7ka po se pash\u00eb nj\u00ebher\u00eb se \u00e7far\u00eb ka th\u00ebn\u00eb Zhizhek. Nj\u00eb prej arsyeve q\u00eb jam ky\u00e7ur n\u00eb fillim me t\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb se filozofia \u00ebsht\u00eb me t\u00eb qeshur, dhe nuk e ke kuptuar Zhizhekun n\u00ebse nuk qesh, ose m\u00eb sakt\u00eb akoma nuk e ke kuptuar Hegelin n\u00ebse nuk qesh, se me Zhizhekun nuk ke sesi t\u00eb mos qesh\u00ebsh. M\u00eb kujtohet nj\u00eb batut\u00eb e tij: I thon\u00eb Nils Borit, nj\u00eb shkenc\u00ebtari i avancuar, ateist se p\u00ebrse e mbante nj\u00eb patkua te dera:\u00a0\u201cTi je gjith\u00eb ky njeri i zgjuar, intelektual i jasht\u00ebzakonsh\u00ebm, ti nuk beson n\u00eb k\u00ebto budalliqe!\u201d. Ky thot\u00eb sigurisht q\u00eb nuk besoj n\u00eb k\u00ebto budalliqe, por m\u00eb kan\u00eb th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00eb edhe po s\u2019besove funksionon. Me k\u00ebt\u00eb barcalet\u00eb, Zhizhek thot\u00eb q\u00eb k\u00ebshtu funksionon ideologjia sot. Askush nuk identifikohet me gj\u00ebrat q\u00eb ndodhin n\u00eb publik, t\u00eb cilat t\u00eb gjitha na interpelojn\u00eb, na kapin, na th\u00ebrrasin p\u00ebr me kry pun\u00eb, ama gjithsecili thot\u00eb se\u00a0nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb problem i tij, thjesht e b\u00ebra se e kam pun\u00eb, detyrim. Pra t\u00eb gjith\u00eb e kan\u00eb nj\u00eb lloj distance minimale nga gj\u00ebrat q\u00eb realisht ndodhin. Ai merr deviz\u00ebn e Hegelit, ku thot\u00eb q\u00eb di\u00e7ka b\u00ebhet v\u00ebrtet universale kur ajo funksionon edhe pse \u00ebsht\u00eb jasht\u00eb nesh, \u00ebsht\u00eb efektive dhe nuk ka nevoj\u00eb q\u00eb njer\u00ebzit t\u00eb besojn\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb. Njer\u00ebzit mjafton ta kryejn\u00eb, s\u2019ka nevoj\u00eb q\u00eb ta besojn\u00eb dhe do vazhdoj\u00eb t\u00eb funksionoj\u00eb. Dhe Zhizhek thot\u00eb q\u00eb kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb fryma e koh\u00ebs. E kam fjal\u00ebn n\u00eb fillim me t\u00eb qeshur,\u00a0por pastaj arrin t\u00eb shpjegoj\u00eb dhe t\u00eb interpretoj\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb ndodh nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>

Genci Shehu<\/b><\/strong>: Gati-gati si\u00e7 ka ardhur Edi Rama n\u00eb pushtet, duke tallur veten, duke b\u00ebr\u00eb pala\u00e7on dhe e kan\u00eb votuar njer\u00ebzit, pasi identifikohen me t\u00eb. Njer\u00ebzit e ndjejn\u00eb veten q\u00eb jan\u00eb po aq banal sa ai dhe mendimi \u00ebsht\u00eb aq i preksh\u00ebm sa ai e paraqet. Nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb Zhizhek e b\u00ebn strategjikisht nga drejtimi i kund\u00ebrt. E nj\u00ebjta struktur\u00eb si me Putinin. Ai nuk ka fjalor aq t\u00eb r\u00ebnd\u00eb privatisht, sa e ka publikisht. Shkon takon Merkelin duhet ta b\u00ebj\u00eb nj\u00eb batut\u00eb seksiste sa p\u00ebr ta l\u00ebn\u00eb goj\u00ebhapur, sepse nuk e mban dot figur\u00ebn e autoritetit pa e tallur. Ajo figur\u00eb perpetuohet duke u tallur, dhe ashtu vjen n\u00eb pushtet, prandaj do thoja q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb vet\u00ebm n\u00eb dy vitet e fundit q\u00eb e ka k\u00ebt\u00eb diagnoz\u00ebn e mir\u00ebsjelljes, por k\u00ebto dy vitet e fundit e ka theksuar jasht\u00ebzakonisht shum\u00eb. N\u00eb fillim Zhizhekun e d\u00ebgjon p\u00ebr shakat\u00eb dhe ndoshta m\u00eb von\u00eb p\u00ebr p\u00ebrmbajtjen. Vjen si Stand up comedy, edhe pse ai tenton ta shpjegoj\u00eb vet\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb fenomen. Ai shprehej se i vinte shum\u00eb keq sepse ngjante sikur e d\u00ebgjonin vet\u00ebm p\u00ebr shaka, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb ai se kishte fare me shaka at\u00eb q\u00eb thoshte, dhe k\u00ebt\u00eb e thot\u00eb p\u00ebr ta mbajtur larg t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00ebn e gj\u00ebs\u00eb q\u00eb thot\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>

Pavjo Gjini:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0Madje ka dhe nj\u00eb kritik\u00eb n\u00eb lidhje me k\u00ebt\u00eb. Koh\u00ebt e fundit, sidomos pas fitores s\u00eb Trumpit shum\u00eb emisione televizive n\u00eb SHBA jan\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb tmerr\u00ebsisht popullore, sidomos emisioni i John Oliver q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb drejtp\u00ebrdrejt kundra presidentit Trump. Zhizhek po insiston gjithmon\u00eb e m\u00eb shum\u00eb q\u00eb kjo q\u00eb po b\u00ebjn\u00eb k\u00ebta nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb fare subversive, dmth sa m\u00eb shum\u00eb e tallin aq m\u00eb shum\u00eb e mbajn\u00eb n\u00eb pushtet, dhe ka shum\u00eb mund\u00ebsi q\u00eb k\u00ebsaj frike i druhet edhe vet\u00eb kur i sheh njer\u00ebzit vazhdimisht duke qeshur me t\u00eb. Shum\u00eb moshatar\u00eb t\u00eb mi ndjekin transmetime televizive q\u00eb p\u00ebrqeshin pushtetin, por deri n\u00eb momentin kur pash\u00eb q\u00eb Rama postoi videon e tyre duke u tall me t\u00eb n\u00eb facebook, apo ftes\u00ebn e aktorit Florian Binaj n\u00eb Kongresin e PS-s\u00eb m\u00eb erdhi ideja e m\u00ebsip\u00ebrme q\u00eb n\u00eb fakt kjo kritik\u00eb, q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kritik\u00eb nuk ka asgj\u00eb subversive.<\/span><\/p>

<\/i>Ju that\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb q\u00eb shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb kriz\u00eb, i dob\u00ebsuar n\u00eb Evrop\u00eb. Sa vlen kjo analiz\u00eb e Zhizhekut p\u00ebr shantazhin e dyfisht\u00eb?<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Genci Shehu:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0Kjo ide m\u00eb lindi kur ishim duke ardhur dhe po flisja me Pavjon p\u00ebr ngjarjet e fundit. Nj\u00eb nd\u00ebr gj\u00ebrat e reja q\u00eb kishte ndodhur ishte se Libia kishte refuzuar t\u00eb vazhdonte k\u00ebt\u00eb pun\u00ebn me procesimin e refugjat\u00ebve. Dhe nga kjo lind pyetja se deri ku jan\u00eb konform propozimeve t\u00eb Zhizhekut te kapitulli i fundit k\u00ebto qendra procesimi. Nd\u00ebrmend m\u00eb erdhi nj\u00eb radio satirike, e cila kishte nj\u00eb figur\u00eb t\u00eb ngjashme me Nastradinin ton\u00eb dhe e merrnin n\u00eb telefon, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb ai p\u00ebrpiqej t\u2019u p\u00ebrgjigjej pyetjeve me shprehjen \u201dpo n\u00eb parim k\u00ebshtu \u00ebsht\u00eb, por\u2026\u201d Dhe e pyesin \u201ca \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet \u2026q\u00eb Nastradini po themi\u2026ka fituar llotarin\u00eb ? Po n\u00eb parim \u00ebsht\u00eb e v\u00ebrtet\u00eb \u2013 p\u00ebrgjigjeshin, vet\u00ebm se nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb makin\u00eb por nj\u00eb bi\u00e7iklet\u00eb, dhe nuk e ka fituar por ia kan\u00eb vjedhur.\u201d Edhe k\u00ebto qendrat e procesimit, n\u00eb parim shkojn\u00eb konform me parimet e Zhizhekut. Dallimi q\u00ebndron se Zhizheku propozonte krijimin e zyrave t\u00eb ngjashme n\u00eb vende si Libia, Siria, dhe Turqia q\u00eb jan\u00eb m\u00eb n\u00eb prag t\u00eb prurjeve t\u00eb refugjat\u00ebve dhe t\u00eb ishte nj\u00eb ushtri me mision t\u00eb majt\u00eb, ushtria e vet\u00eb BE-s\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u2019i shp\u00ebrndar\u00eb vet\u00eb n\u00eb vendet e BE-s\u00eb, duke vler\u00ebsuar kontributin q\u00eb kan\u00eb patur k\u00ebto vende p\u00ebr t\u2019i mbajtur, jo vet\u00ebm kapacitetin p\u00ebr t\u2019i mbajtur. N\u00eb fakt k\u00ebto zyra merren m\u00eb shum\u00eb me rishp\u00ebrndarjen e refugjat\u00ebve brenda p\u00ebr brenda vendeve afrikane q\u00eb jan\u00eb sakaq ose shkret\u00ebtir\u00eb ose\u00a0g\u00ebrmadh\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>

P\u00ebr t\u00eb ardhur te titulli i librit, \u00e7far\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb pra n\u00eb thelb shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb?<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Genci Shehu:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0Shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb kur t\u00eb paraqiten dy mund\u00ebsi ku secila \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00eb keq se tjetra dhe q\u00eb n\u00eb fakt nuk jan\u00eb mund\u00ebsi, t\u00eb japin nj\u00eb mund\u00ebsi akoma edhe m\u00eb t\u00eb keqe p\u00ebrball\u00eb nj\u00eb varianti t\u00eb keq. Normal, prej nevoj\u00ebs duhet ta b\u00ebjm\u00eb, dhe si me th\u00ebn\u00eb zgjidhja e saj e perpetuon shantazhin. N\u00eb historin\u00eb gjeopoltike t\u00eb Europ\u00ebs, historia e shantazhit t\u00eb dyfisht\u00eb ka nisur t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn me Greqin\u00eb me masat shtr\u00ebnguese t\u00eb ekonomis\u00eb, si tentativ\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb zgjidhur problemet ekonomike,\u00a0ama struktura e k\u00ebsaj zgjidhjeje e p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsonte gjendjen de fakto t\u00eb Greqis\u00eb. Kur ndodhi referndumi n\u00eb 2015-n, u votua kund\u00ebr masave q\u00eb propozonte BE dhe q\u00eb t\u00eb nes\u00ebrmen u veprua sipas k\u00ebshillimeve t\u00eb BE-se. N\u00eb at\u00eb moment u b\u00eb e dukshme publikisht q\u00eb vota e popullit nuk ndryshon kontratat e vjetra ekonomike nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare, q\u00eb do t\u00eb thot\u00eb demokracia nuk funksionon v\u00ebrtet, \u00ebsht\u00eb thjesht p\u00ebr form\u00eb. Kjo u b\u00eb e dukshme me referendumin n\u00eb Greqi, Brexit, Tramp, Putin, t\u00eb thuash q\u00eb shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb ka arritur t\u00eb mbizot\u00ebroj\u00eb. Fitoi Macroni kund\u00ebr Le Pen me shantazhin e dyfisht\u00eb. Le Pen ishte m\u00eb keq. P\u00ebr t\u00eb m\u00ebnjanuar nj\u00eb keqkuptim, s\u2019po themi q\u00eb gjendja \u00ebsht\u00eb e mir\u00eb dhe ta l\u00ebm\u00eb t\u00eb zhvillohet pa u prekur dhe jemi lule. Sakt\u00ebsisht e kund\u00ebrta, k\u00ebshtu b\u00ebhet evidente, e pamohueshme q\u00eb situata \u00ebsht\u00eb keq, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb n\u00eb nj\u00eb moment m\u00eb her\u00ebt ishim n\u00eb pozicionet q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb dhe aq keq.<\/span><\/p>

<\/i>Po n\u00eb rastin e Shqip\u00ebris\u00eb a jemi ne n\u00eb nj\u00eb situat\u00eb t\u00eb till\u00eb? Jemi n\u00eb gjendjen q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb dhe aq keq, apo jemi n\u00eb gjendjen q\u00eb nuk ka m\u00eb keq?<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Genci Shehu: <\/b><\/strong>Nuk di t\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjem menj\u00ebher\u00eb. N\u00eb nivelin e BE-s\u00eb tema kryesore b\u00ebhet me refugjat\u00ebt, p\u00ebr aq sa nuk trajtojm\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje politike, t\u00eb v\u00ebrteta. N\u00eb aspektin e refugjat\u00ebve e kemi ndryshe situat\u00ebn n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri. Vendi yn\u00eb konsiderohet m\u00eb shum\u00eb si ur\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb kaluar n\u00eb vende t\u00eb tjera,\u00a0ose rasti i Sllovenis\u00eb q\u00eb p\u00ebrdoret si ur\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb kaluar n\u00eb Suedi. Endrra e emigrant\u00ebve nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb Sllovenia, \u00ebsht\u00eb Suedia, Gjermania\u00a0etj. K\u00ebto vendet funksionojn\u00eb ose si ur\u00eb ose n\u00ebnur\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb mbajtur nj\u00eb tepri me refugjat\u00eb dhe t\u2019i trajtoj\u00eb ashtu si\u00e7 do mund t\u2019i trajtoj\u00eb. Tamam si n\u00ebn ur\u00eb, ndaj nuk di si ta them sesi \u00ebsht\u00eb shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri.<\/span><\/p>

Pavjo Gjini:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0P\u00ebrpos q\u00eb jemi m\u00ebsuar q\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb n\u00eb zgjedhjet elektorale, alternativa ka qen\u00eb me zgjedh t\u00eb keqen m\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl. Dmth ne jemi rritur me k\u00ebt\u00eb, ti asnj\u00ebher\u00eb nuk ke pas\u00eb n\u00eb zgjedhje nj\u00eb program pozitiv. Gjithmon\u00eb ke pas\u00eb \u201dshihe ca katastrofe \u00ebsht\u00eb pushteti\u201d dhe zgjidh t\u00eb keqen m\u00eb t\u00eb vog\u00ebl, t\u00eb pakt\u00ebn p\u00ebr brezin tim.<\/span><\/p>

Genci Shehu: <\/b><\/strong>N\u00eb nj\u00eb aspekt t\u00eb till\u00eb, do vlente nj\u00eb parrull\u00eb, ose di\u00e7ka si n\u00eb trajtat e nj\u00eb parrulle \u201cM\u00eb mir\u00eb Basha n\u00eb pushtet sesa Rama\u201d. Do thon\u00eb pse po? Do thuash pse jo. A nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb ideja e demokracis\u00eb riciklimi i pushtetit? \u00cbsht\u00eb brenda sistemike.<\/span><\/p>

Tek thyerja e tabuve t\u00eb s\u00eb majt\u00ebs, Zhizhek thot\u00eb q\u00eb k\u00ebrc\u00ebnimi i v\u00ebrtet\u00eb p\u00ebr m\u00ebnyr\u00ebn e jetes\u00ebs nuk vjen n\u00eb trajt\u00ebn e refugjat\u00ebve por shtrihet n\u00eb dinamik\u00ebn e kapitalizmit global.<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Pavjo Gjini: <\/b><\/strong>Ka nj\u00eb pjes\u00eb t\u00eb bukur q\u00eb merret me shtrirjen e struktur\u00ebs s\u00eb subjektit global:\u00a0subjekti i sot\u00ebm kur tenton me e pohu veten, k\u00ebrkon ta pohoj\u00eb veten si viktim\u00eb dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb e gjitha logjika kompensive. Kush \u00ebsht\u00eb figura e viktim\u00ebs: subjekti i dhunuar\u00a0dhe e gjith\u00eb p\u00ebrpjekja e tij politike dhe juridike \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb kaloj\u00eb ligje kompensimesh. Dhe ka 30 vite q\u00eb ky \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb prej subjekteve kryesore dominante. Tani po del nj\u00eb burri i bardh\u00eb amerikan i ish-klas\u00ebs pun\u00ebtore, i cili po thot\u00eb q\u00eb emigranti i ardhur m\u00eb ka shkat\u00ebrruar ekonomin\u00eb vendase. Paradoksi \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb figur\u00ebn e viktim\u00ebs po e merr ai q\u00eb klasikisht supozohej t\u00eb ishte problemi.<\/span><\/p>

<\/b>Genci Shehu:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0Dinamika e kapitalizmit nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb se \u00ebsht\u00eb ky subjekti, por \u00e7\u00ebshtja e k\u00ebtij subjekti \u00ebsht\u00eb shembull i mir\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb treguar q\u00eb nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kjo \u00e7\u00ebshtja, sepse ta b\u00ebsh veten viktim\u00eb si modalitet subjektivimi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb nga format e nd\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebs s\u00eb re t\u00eb sistemit. Kjo form\u00eb e nd\u00ebrgjegjes s\u00eb re e sistemit e shtyn deri n\u00eb pik\u00ebn q\u00eb ai q\u00eb duhej t\u00eb ishte fajtori po e luan loj\u00ebn sikur t\u00eb ishte viktima.<\/span><\/p>

Pavjo Gjini:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0N\u00eb fakt \u00ebsht\u00eb viktim\u00eb, por i kapitalizmit dhe jo i emigrantit.<\/span><\/p>

N\u00eb lib\u00ebr p\u00ebrmendet rasti i banor\u00ebve t\u00eb periferis\u00eb s\u00eb Parisit t\u00eb cil\u00ebt ngrihen n\u00eb protest\u00eb kund\u00ebr deklaratave fyese t\u00eb ish-ministrit t\u00eb brendsh\u00ebm t\u00eb asaj koh<\/i><\/em>e<\/i><\/em>, i cili u drejtohet me fjal\u00ebn \u201cllum\u201d banor\u00ebve t\u00eb periferis\u00eb. K\u00ebtu gjejm\u00eb t\u00eb trajtuar konceptin e <\/i><\/em>\u201c<\/i><\/em>protest\u00ebs s\u00eb nivelit zero\u2019\u2019 ku protestuesit k\u00ebmbngulin tek njohja, nuk k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb asgj\u00eb, dhe \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb akt i themeluar mbi mllef dhe m\u00ebri. A ju ka ndihmuar ky lloj interepretimi p\u00ebr t\u00eb par\u00eb raste t\u00eb ngjashme n\u00eb Shqp\u00ebri, ose a kemi pasur raste t\u00eb protestave t\u00eb nivelit zero?<\/i><\/em><\/span><\/p>

Genci Shehu:<\/b><\/strong>\u00a0Protesa e nivelit zera m\u00eb ka ngjar\u00eb ajo me tort\u00ebn, edhe pse nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb par\u00eb si protest\u00eb, por po flas nga forma e performimit. M\u00eb erdhi n\u00eb mendje p\u00ebr shkak se nuk kishte pretendime ideologjike. Ajo ishte me rastin e Fest\u00ebs s\u00eb Pavar\u00ebsis\u00eb, nd\u00ebrkoh\u00eb q\u00eb mua m\u00eb ishte fshir\u00eb nga mendja q\u00eb ishte p\u00ebr Pavarsin\u00eb. Nuk ishte organizuar n\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb t\u00eb atill\u00eb, p\u00ebr nga ana formale n\u00eb form\u00ebn e nj\u00eb rituali apo p\u00ebrvjetori n\u00eb t\u00eb cilin t\u00eb nderoheshin simblokisht figurat e trash\u00ebgimis\u00eb kulturore, por ka mund\u00ebsi t\u00eb jem gabim. N\u00eb rastin e protes\u00ebs s\u00eb nivelit zero Zhizhek e ka p\u00ebr t\u00eb treguar rastin kur protestojn\u00eb pik\u00ebrisht munges\u00ebn e ideologjis\u00eb.<\/span><\/p>

\"\"<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

25.07.2018 | nyje.al \u00a0 Kund\u00ebr shantazhit t\u00eb dyfisht\u00eb: bised\u00eb me redaktuesit shkencor\u00eb Genci Shehu dhe Pavjo Gjini N\u00eb daljen e tij t\u00eb fundit n\u00eb Madrid, n\u00eb maj t\u00eb vitit 2018-s, filozofi slloven Sllavoj Zhizhek u vler\u00ebsua me \u00e7mimin e Rrethit t\u00eb Arteve t\u00eb Bukura. N\u00eb momentin q\u00eb ky filozof merr \u00e7mimin, thot\u00eb q\u00eb nuk i p\u00eblqejn\u00eb k\u00ebto gj\u00ebra, por ama ua pranoj dhe ndihem i nderuar q\u00eb po ma jepni. \u00c7mimi kishte motivimin e nj\u00eb figure\u00a0si Zhizheku i cili ndikon n\u00eb p\u00ebrhapjen mendimit\u00a0kritik te t\u00eb rinjt\u00eb. U shpreh se akte t\u00eb tilla provokuese na duhen sidomos n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb koh\u00eb kur e djathta dhe e gjith\u00eb fryma e Trumpit ka krijuar te njer\u00ebzit iden\u00eb se t\u00eb jesh i sjellsh\u00ebm \u00ebsht\u00eb di\u00e7ka tashm\u00eb e tejkaluar dhe e dal\u00eb mode. S\u00eb dyti n\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn dalje publike thekson q\u00eb ndjehet nj\u00eb lloj presioni n\u00eb mjediset universitare, akademike p\u00ebr t\u2019i b\u00ebr\u00eb ato t\u00eb dobishme, praktike, p\u00ebrndryshe impakti i tyre konsiderohet i pavlefsh\u00ebm. A ka sh\u00ebrbyer ky moment p\u00ebr t\u00eb p\u00ebrkufizuar pozit\u00ebn e k\u00ebtij njeriu n\u00eb raport me t\u00eb djatht\u00ebn dhe sjelleve publike? Genci Shehu:\u00a0S\u00eb pari me pjes\u00ebn e figur\u00ebs s\u00eb personit q\u00eb mund t\u00eb jet\u00eb rr\u00ebmbyer apo futur n\u00eb v\u00ebrshimin e frym\u00ebs s\u00eb Trumpit dhe t\u00eb djatht\u00ebs alternative q\u00eb ka lindur nga 2017 e k\u00ebndej, do thoja q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb jemi m\u00eb t\u00eb sjellsh\u00ebm me ta. Gabimi tipik q\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb t\u00eb majt\u00ebt liberal, e th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00ebllimisht t\u00eb majt\u00ebt liberal pasi priren nga t\u00eb q\u00ebnurit korrekt politikisht, \u00ebsht\u00eb sharja, p\u00ebrbuzja apo tallja q\u00eb b\u00ebjn\u00eb ndaj t\u00eb djatht\u00ebve. Mb\u00ebshtet\u00ebsit e Trumpit m\u00eb shum\u00eb hidh\u00ebrohen dhe nguliten m\u00eb thell\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb pozicion q\u00eb sakaq jan\u00eb, sesa kan\u00eb mund\u00ebsi dialogu. N\u00eb nj\u00eb moment ku tjetri (i djatht\u00eb) mund t\u00eb haset me nj\u00eb logjik\u00eb tjet\u00ebr dhe t\u00eb ndeshet me fakte,\u00a0\u00ebsht\u00eb hapi i par\u00eb ku mund t\u00eb hyjm\u00eb n\u00eb dialog. N\u00ebse nuk jemi t\u00eb sjellsh\u00ebm nuk mundemi ta b\u00ebjm\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb, nuk mjafton q\u00eb t\u00eb themi q\u00eb kjo rrym\u00eb e re e djatht\u00eb eshte treguese q\u00eb situata jon\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb p\u00ebrkeq\u00ebsuar shum\u00eb dhe ta mbyllim me aq. Madje na vlen q\u00eb ta themi m\u00eb shum\u00eb q\u00eb ky zhvillim i ri \u00ebsht\u00eb shenj\u00eb shprese p\u00ebr ne.\u00a0P\u00ebr ta th\u00ebn\u00eb paraprakisht, para se t\u00eb kalojm\u00eb me lokalizimin e kuptimit t\u00eb shantazhit t\u00eb dyfisht\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb se ndoshta sot nuk po funksionon shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb n\u00eb Europ\u00eb dhe kjo \u00ebsht\u00eb shenj\u00eb e mir\u00eb. Shantazhi i dyfisht\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb forma sesi t\u00eb mban t\u00eb kapur n\u00eb sistem vet\u00eb sistemi. N\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast BE me arkitektonik\u00ebn e saj t\u00eb keqbazuar. Vet\u00eb fakti q\u00eb ka shenja d\u00ebshtimi t\u00eb shantazhit t\u00eb dyfisht\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb shenj\u00eb e mir\u00eb, pasi ka refuzim t\u00eb pranimit t\u00eb ligj\u00ebrimit t\u00eb establishmentit. Hyrja e k\u00ebtij diskutimi ishte e till\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb zbuluar figur\u00ebn e k\u00ebtij filozofi duke ju referuar t\u00eb djatht\u00ebs, n\u00eb pozit\u00ebn e nj\u00eb t\u00eb majti kundrejt kapitalizmit dhe kusht\u00ebzimit t\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00ebs s\u00eb t\u00eb jetuarit q\u00eb i ka b\u00ebr\u00eb njer\u00ebzve n\u00eb epok\u00ebn ton\u00eb. Cila \u00ebsht\u00eb pozita e Zhizhekut p\u00ebrball\u00eb k\u00ebtyre fenomeneve dhe p\u00ebrse q\u00ebndrimet e tij jan\u00eb t\u00eb d\u00ebshirueshme, p\u00ebrse thirret gjithmon\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb lexuar situata t\u00eb tilla?\u00a0 Pavjo Gjini: P\u00ebr tradit\u00ebn e filozofis\u00eb s\u00eb 40 viteve t\u00eb fundit, thirrja p\u00ebr ta interpretuar bot\u00ebn ka qen\u00eb thirrja kryesore dhe Zhizheku \u00ebsht\u00eb n\u00eb rradh\u00ebn e atyre filozof\u00ebve q\u00eb insistojn\u00eb n\u00eb kthyerjen kok\u00ebposht\u00eb t\u00eb tezes s\u00eb Feuerbach t\u00eb Marxit; Marksi thot\u00eb q\u00eb filozof\u00ebt deri tani kan\u00eb tentuar p\u00ebr ta interpretuar bot\u00ebn, dhe \u00e7\u00ebshtja \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb ta ndryshojm\u00eb. Nd\u00ebrsa Zhizhek insiston tek e kund\u00ebrta, thot\u00eb ndoshta kemi tentuar shum\u00eb koh\u00ebt e fundit p\u00ebr ta ndryshuar bot\u00ebn, ndaj tani ka ardhur koha p\u00ebr ta interpretuar at\u00eb. K\u00ebshtuq\u00eb un\u00eb mund t\u00eb flas si lexues. \u00cbsht\u00eb nj\u00eb shprehje q\u00eb Zhizhek e p\u00ebrmend shpesh:\u00a0ai thot\u00eb q\u00eb un\u00eb shkruaj p\u00ebr ata q\u00eb n\u00eb gjuh\u00ebn e p\u00ebrditshme i quajm\u00eb si t\u00eb vonuar, ata q\u00eb s\u2019arrijn\u00eb me kuptu situat\u00ebn, q\u00eb gjithmon\u00eb nuk din\u00eb sesi ti raportohen bot\u00ebs, tjetrit, disi figura e teveqelit. Zhizhek shkruan p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb modalitet personi dhe un\u00eb vet\u00eb e kam nis\u00eb dhe jam ky\u00e7ur n\u00eb t\u00eb p\u00ebr faktin se ma b\u00ebn bot\u00ebn t\u00eb interpretueshme. Ndaj ai lexohet m\u00eb shum\u00eb p\u00ebr interpretimin e bot\u00ebs sesa p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb prej tij maksima dhe t\u00eb vazhdosh pastaj me nj\u00eb aksion politik imediat pasi ke mbaruar librin. Edhe pasi ke mbaruar librin nuk do t\u00eb dish se \u00e7far\u00eb duhet t\u00eb b\u00ebsh me jet\u00ebn t\u00ebnde\u2026jo! Thjesht je pak m\u00eb i qart\u00eb te ky konstelacioni i forcave gjeo-politike bot\u00ebrore edhe sesi jan\u00eb t\u00eb implikume n\u00eb kriz\u00ebn e refugjat\u00ebve, di\u00e7ka e cila nuk vihet n\u00eb pah nga ata q\u00eb thon\u00eb direkt mbaj an\u00eb.\u00a0Kemi ca protofashist\u00eb ksenofob anti-emigrant, t\u00eb cil\u00ebt t\u00eb thon\u00eb q\u00eb duhet t\u00eb rrish me establishmentin se p\u00ebrndryshe ja ku i ke k\u00ebta k\u00ebrc\u00ebnuesit jasht\u00eb; t\u00eb thon\u00eb po ashtu angazhohu pasi nuk ka koh\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb mendu, dhe sidomos n\u00eb Shqip\u00ebri q\u00eb \u00ebsht\u00eb niveli i diskursit t\u00eb s\u00eb majt\u00ebs liberale n\u00eb Europ\u00eb. \u201cA, po boll kemi ba teori vet\u00ebm vepro direkt\u2026ska nevoj\u00eb me mendu, vet\u00ebm \u00e7a t\u00eb b\u00ebjm\u00eb tani dhe t\u00eb vazhdojm\u00eb k\u00ebshtu symbyllurazi p\u00ebrpara\u201d dhe Zhizheku i reziston vazhdimisht k\u00ebsaj, thot\u00eb jo: ndoshta kemi vepru tep\u00ebr, ndalo; mendo. Dhe n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb sens \u00ebsht\u00eb disi kund\u00ebrveprues n\u00eb raport me gjith\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb maksim\u00ebn e veprimit, angazhimit, aktivizmit, por sigurisht pa hequr dor\u00eb nga perspektiva e majt\u00eb emancipuese. U b\u00ebn\u00eb dy vite, q\u00eb kur ka ardh\u00eb Trumpi n\u00eb pushtet q\u00eb duhet t\u2019i rikthehemi nj\u00eb mir\u00ebsjellje klasike ndaj tjetrit dhe ndaj hap\u00ebsir\u00ebs publike sepse niveli i diskursit n\u00eb hap\u00ebsir\u00ebn publike ka degradu shum\u00eb. Rasti i ardhjes s\u00eb Ram\u00ebs n\u00eb pushtet: ai erdhi jo duke th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00eb jam Kryeministri q\u00eb e di rrug\u00ebn\u00a0dhe\u00a0e di se nga duhet t\u00eb shkojm\u00eb. Jo. Ai vjen n\u00eb pushtet duke th\u00ebn\u00eb q\u00eb jam si gjith\u00eb ju t\u00eb tjer\u00ebt, jam po aq i ul\u00ebt dhe po aq i ndyr\u00eb. P\u00ebrse na ndihmon ky krahasim? Pavjo Gjini:\u00a0P\u00ebr ta shpjeguar m\u00eb duhet t\u00eb rimarr nj\u00eb diskutim t\u00eb b\u00ebr\u00eb para disa jav\u00ebsh te Qendra Ata me t\u00eb ftuar Ardian Vehbiun. Edhe pse ndoshta nuk e ka pasur n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb kontekst, mendoj se kemi nj\u00eb problem tjet\u00ebr nga ajo q\u00eb konstaton Vehbiu n\u00eb lidhje me personin dhe sjelljen e tij n\u00eb publik. Modeli i<\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":17588,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"episode_type":"","audio_file":"","podmotor_file_id":"","podmotor_episode_id":"","cover_image":"","cover_image_id":"","duration":"","filesize":"","filesize_raw":"","date_recorded":"","explicit":"","block":"","ocean_post_layout":"right-sidebar","ocean_both_sidebars_style":"","ocean_both_sidebars_content_width":0,"ocean_both_sidebars_sidebars_width":0,"ocean_sidebar":"ocs-kryenyje-category-post-sidebar","ocean_second_sidebar":"0","ocean_disable_margins":"enable","ocean_add_body_class":"","ocean_shortcode_before_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_after_top_bar":"","ocean_shortcode_before_header":"","ocean_shortcode_after_header":"","ocean_has_shortcode":"","ocean_shortcode_after_title":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_widgets":"","ocean_shortcode_before_footer_bottom":"","ocean_shortcode_after_footer_bottom":"","ocean_display_top_bar":"default","ocean_display_header":"default","ocean_header_style":"","ocean_center_header_left_menu":"0","ocean_custom_header_template":"0","ocean_custom_logo":0,"ocean_custom_retina_logo":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_width":0,"ocean_custom_logo_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_tablet_max_height":0,"ocean_custom_logo_mobile_max_height":0,"ocean_header_custom_menu":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_family":"0","ocean_menu_typo_font_subset":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_size":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_font_size_unit":"px","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_font_weight_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_tablet":"","ocean_menu_typo_transform_mobile":"","ocean_menu_typo_line_height":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_line_height_unit":"","ocean_menu_typo_spacing":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_tablet":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_mobile":0,"ocean_menu_typo_spacing_unit":"","ocean_menu_link_color":"","ocean_menu_link_color_hover":"","ocean_menu_link_color_active":"","ocean_menu_link_background":"","ocean_menu_link_hover_background":"","ocean_menu_link_active_background":"","ocean_menu_social_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_bg":"","ocean_menu_social_links_color":"","ocean_menu_social_hover_links_color":"","ocean_disable_title":"default","ocean_disable_heading":"on","ocean_post_title":"","ocean_post_subheading":"","ocean_post_title_style":"","ocean_post_title_background_color":"","ocean_post_title_background":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_image_position":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_attachment":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_repeat":"","ocean_post_title_bg_image_size":"","ocean_post_title_height":0,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay":0.5,"ocean_post_title_bg_overlay_color":"","ocean_disable_breadcrumbs":"default","ocean_breadcrumbs_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_separator_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_color":"","ocean_breadcrumbs_links_hover_color":"","ocean_display_footer_widgets":"default","ocean_display_footer_bottom":"default","ocean_custom_footer_template":"0","ocean_post_oembed":"","ocean_post_self_hosted_media":"","ocean_post_video_embed":"","ocean_link_format":"","ocean_link_format_target":"self","ocean_quote_format":"","ocean_quote_format_link":"post","ocean_gallery_link_images":"off","ocean_gallery_id":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1457","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-kulture","entry","has-media"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1457","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1457"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1457\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24568,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1457\/revisions\/24568"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17588"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1457"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1457"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nyje.al\/sq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1457"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}